The costs of monitoring trachoma elimination: Impact, surveillance, and trachomatous trichiasis (TT)-only surveys
- PMID: 31487281
- PMCID: PMC6728015
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007605
The costs of monitoring trachoma elimination: Impact, surveillance, and trachomatous trichiasis (TT)-only surveys
Abstract
Background: Although trachoma causes more cases of preventable blindness than any other infectious disease, a combination of strategies is reducing its global prevalence. As a district moves toward eliminating trachoma as a public health problem, national programs conduct trachoma impact surveys (TIS) to assess whether to stop preventative interventions and trachoma surveillance surveys (TSS) to determine whether the prevalence of active trachoma has rebounded after interventions have halted. In some contexts, programs also conduct trachomatous trichiasis (TT)-only surveys. A few costing studies of trachoma prevalence surveys exist, but none examine TIS, TSS, or TT-only surveys.
Methodology/principal findings: We assessed the incremental financial cost to the national program of TIS, TSS, and TT-only surveys, which are standardized cluster-sampled prevalence surveys. We conducted a retrospective review of expenditures and grant disbursements for TIS and TSS in 322 evaluation units in 11 countries between 2011 and 2018. We also assessed the costs of three pilot and five standard TT-only surveys in four countries between 2017 and 2018. The median cost of TIS and TSS was $8,298 per evaluation unit [interquartile range (IQR): $6,532-$10,111, 2017 USD]. Based on a linear regression with bootstrapped confidence intervals, after controlling for country, costs per survey did not change significantly over time but did decline by $83 per survey implemented in a single round (95% CI: -$108 --$63). Of total costs, 80% went to survey fieldwork; of that, 58% went towards per diems and 38% towards travel. TT-only surveys cost a median of $9,707 (IQR: $8,537-$11,635); within a given country, they cost slightly more (106% [IQR: 94%-136%]) than TIS and TSS.
Conclusions/significance: The World Health Organization requires trachoma prevalence estimates for validating the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem. This study will help programs improve their planning as they assemble resources for that effort.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Elimination of trachoma as a public health problem in Ghana: Providing evidence through a pre-validation survey.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Dec 12;11(12):e0006099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006099. eCollection 2017 Dec. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017. PMID: 29232708 Free PMC article.
-
The Gambia Trachomatous Trichiasis Surveys: Results from Five Evaluation Units Confirm Attainment of Trachoma Elimination Thresholds.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;31(6):534-542. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2213320. Epub 2023 Jul 3. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 37401113
-
A cost-analysis of conducting population-based prevalence surveys for the validation of the elimination of trachoma as a public health problem in Amhara, Ethiopia.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Sep 3;14(9):e0008401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008401. eCollection 2020 Sep. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020. PMID: 32881881 Free PMC article.
-
Progress Towards Elimination of Trachoma as a Public Health Problem in Eritrea: Results of a Systematic Review and Nine Population-based Prevalence Surveys Conducted in 2014.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;25(sup1):121-130. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2018.1545036. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 30806541 Free PMC article.
-
Lessons learned for surveillance strategies for trachoma elimination as a public health problem, from the evaluation of approaches utilised by Guinea worm and onchocerciasis programmes: A literature review.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Jan 28;15(1):e0009082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009082. eCollection 2021 Jan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021. PMID: 33507903 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Prevalence of Trachomatous Trichiasis in People Aged 15 Years and Over in Six Evaluation Units of Gaoual, Labé, Dalaba and Beyla Districts, Guinea.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024 Dec;31(6):526-533. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2192269. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 37377215 Free PMC article.
-
Tropical Data: Approach and Methodology as Applied to Trachoma Prevalence Surveys.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):544-560. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2023.2249546. Epub 2023 Dec 12. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 38085791 Free PMC article.
-
Trachoma.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 May 26;8(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00359-5. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022. PMID: 35618795 Review.
-
Validation of routine lymphatic filariasis morbidity surveillance in the Upper West Region, Ghana.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;5(4):e0004336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004336. eCollection 2025. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40173173 Free PMC article.
-
Accelerating Progress Towards the 2030 Neglected Tropical Diseases Targets: How Can Quantitative Modeling Support Programmatic Decisions?Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 25;78(Suppl 2):S83-S92. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae082. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38662692 Free PMC article.
References
-
- WHO. Validation of elimination of trachoma as a public health problem [Internet]. 2016 Jun. Report No.: WHO/HTM/NTD/2016.8. Available: http://www.who.int/trachoma/resources/who_htm_ntd_2016.8/en/
-
- WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group on Neglected Tropical Diseases. Technical consultation on trachoma surveillance September 11–12, 2014, Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, USA: [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2015 Jul. Report No.: WHO/HTM/NTD/2015.02. Available: https://www.who.int/trachoma/resources/who_htm_ntd_2015.02/en/
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials