Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jun 13:33:110.
doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.110.15319. eCollection 2019.

The effect of sputum quality and volume on the yield of bacteriologically-confirmed TB by Xpert MTB/RIF and smear

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The effect of sputum quality and volume on the yield of bacteriologically-confirmed TB by Xpert MTB/RIF and smear

Onani Zimba et al. Pan Afr Med J. .

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization endorsed (2010) the use of Xpert MTB/RIF and countries are shifting from smear microscopy (smear)-based to Xpert MTB/RIF-based tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic algorithms. As with smear, sputum quality may predict the likelihood of obtaining a bacteriologically-confirmed TB when using Xpert MTB/RIF.

Methods: From 08/12-11/2014, all people living with HIV were recruited at 22 clinics. For patients screened positive using the four TB symptoms their sputa were tested by Xpert MTB/RIF and smear. Laboratorians assessed and recorded sputum appearance and volume. The yield of bacteriologically-positive sputum evaluated using Xpert MTB/RIF and smear, likelihood-ratios were calculated.

Results: Among 6,041 patients enrolled 2,296 were presumptive TB, 1,305 (56.8%) had > 1 sputa collected and 644/1,305 (49.3%) had both Xpert MTB/RIF and smear results. Since >1 sputa collected from 644 patients 954 sputa were tested by Xpert MTB/RIF and smear. Bacteriologically-positive sputum was two-fold higher with Xpert MTB/RIF 11.4% versus smear 5.3%, p < 0.001. Sputum appearance and quantity were not predictive of bacteriologically-positive results, except volume of 2ml to < 3ml, tested by Xpert MTB/RIF LR+= 1.26 (95% CI, 1.05-1.50).

Conclusion: Xpert MTB/RIF test yield to bacteriologically-positive sputum was superior to smear. Sputum quality and quantity, however, were not consistently predictive of bacteriologically-positive results by Xpert MTB/RIF or smear.

Keywords: Botswana; Molecular diagnostic yield; sputum quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patients enrolled, screened for tuberculosis symptoms and tested by Xpert MTB/RIF and smear
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of salivary sputum by study sites

References

    1. World Health Organization Monitoring of Xpert MTB/RIF roll-out. Accessed on 21 July 2017.
    1. National Tuberculosis Program Manual . Ministry of Health. Botswana; 2011.
    1. Ho J, Marks GB, Fox GJ. The impact of sputum quality on tuberculosis diagnosis: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015 May;19(5):537–44. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organizations . Quality assurance of sputum microscopy in DOTS Programmes, 2003. Regional Office for the Western Pacific; ISBN 92 9061 056 5. Accessed on 21 July 2017.
    1. Technical guide: sputum examination for tuberculosis by direct microscopy in low income countries. Fifth edition. Paris, France: Int Union of TB and Lung Dis; 2000.

Publication types