Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 24;17(3):200-205.
doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2019.1606381. eCollection 2019.

Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment

Affiliations

Radiation-free flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment

Braulio O Manzo et al. Arab J Urol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS) with holmium laser lithotripsy for treating kidney stones without fluoroscopy as method of best practice for patients and endourologists. Patients and Methods: All patients treated for kidney stones by fURS with holmium laser lithotripsy from February 2016 to February 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients' demographic characteristics, stone features (size, number, and location), surgical variables (use of fluoroscopy, operative and fluoroscopy time), complications, and success rate (employing stone-free rate [SFR]), were included in the analysis. Results: In all, 100 patients met the inclusion criteria: 33 fURS were performed under fluoroscopy (Group 1) and 67 without it (Group 2). The mean operating time was 94.33 vs 98.29 min (P = 0.888), respectively. The mean stone volume was 78.5 vs 82.4 mL (P = 0.885), respectively. The SFR was 63.6% and 64.2% (P = 0.771), the perioperative complications rate was 18.2% vs 11.9% (P = 0.285), and the postoperative complications rate was 24.2% and 10.4%, in groups 1 and 2 respectively (P = 0.174). Conclusions: fURS with holmium laser lithotripsy without fluoroscopy was a feasible and safe treatment for kidney stones. There was no difference between the use of fluoroscopy or not regarding complications or SFR. Thus, we can reduce the risks of radiation exposure to patients and medical staff whilst maintaining surgical success. However, multicentre randomised controlled studies are necessary to evaluate fluoroless URS further and to confirm our present results. Abbreviations: PTFE: polytetrafluoroethylene; SFR: stone-free rate; (f)URS: (flexible) ureterorenoscopy/ureterorenoscopies; US: ultrasonography.

Keywords: Ureteroscopy; fluoroscopy; laser; lithotripsy; radiation; renal stones.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Greene JD, Tenggadjaja CF, Bowman RJ, et al. Comparison of a reduced radiation fluoroscopy protocol to conventional fluoroscopy during uncomplicated ureteroscopy. Urology. 2011;78:286–290. - PubMed
    1. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475–482. - PubMed
    1. Davros WJ. Fluoroscopy: basic science, optimal use, and patient/operator protection. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2007;11:44–54.
    1. Matlaga BR, Krambeck AE, Lingeman JE. Surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, et al editors. Campbell walsh urology. Vol. II 11th Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. 1260–1290. Chapt. 54.
    1. Tepeler A, Armagan A, Akaman T, et al. Is fluoroscopic imaging mandatory for endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones? Urology. 2012;80:1002–1006. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources