Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;27(1):56-64.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07748-3. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective

Jessica I Billig  1 , Erika D Sears  2   3 , Breanna N Travis  4 , Jennifer F Waljee  5
Affiliations

Patient-Reported Outcomes: Understanding Surgical Efficacy and Quality from the Patient's Perspective

Jessica I Billig et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

In surgery, quality assessment encourages improved care delivery, better outcomes, and helps determine surgical efficacy. Quality is important from a patient, provider, payer, and policy maker standpoint. However, given the growth of outpatient procedures, expansion of surgical indications to enhance function, and the decline of perioperative morbidity and mortality, many traditional quality metrics, such as mortality, readmissions, and complications, may not fully capture quality. As such, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be used to complement the established clinical outcomes and describe surgical efficacy and quality from the patient's point of view. Generic and disease-specific PRO measures capture health-related quality of life, functional status, and pain. These measures permit a more holistic understanding of how surgery affects different aspects of a patient's health, augment other clinical outcomes, and are commonly used to determine efficacy in clinical trials. Moreover, our national reimbursement structure is currently evolving to include PROs for certain surgical conditions in measures of quality and with direct linkage to payments. Even so, there continues to be challenges in the implementation of PRO measures in everyday surgical practice, with questions of optimal administration and how to integrate these measures into provider work flow. Despite these challenges, PROs provide vital information regarding surgical efficacy and quality and are critical in the delivery of patient-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Priorities of Key Stakeholders in Quality Assessment
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Conceptual Model of Surgical Efficacy
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Allocation by Year
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Centers of Medicare and Medicaid. Quality Payment Program. 2016; https://qpp.cms.gov. Accessed February 25, 2019.
    1. Waljee JF, Ghaferi A, Finks JF, et al. Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery. Med Care. 2015;53(11):960–966. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birkmeyer JD. Progress and challenges in improving surgical outcomes. Br J Surg. 2012;99(11):1467–1469. - PubMed
    1. Ibrahim AM, Dimick JB. What Metrics Accurately Reflect Surgical Quality? Annu Rev Med. 2018;69:481–491. - PubMed

MeSH terms