Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
- PMID: 31489788
- PMCID: PMC6797563
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2546
Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: In the treatment of spinal metastases, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers precise, high-dose radiation to the target region while sparing the spinal cord. A range of doses and fractions had been reported; however, the optimal prescribed scheme remains unclear.
Methods: Two reviewers performed independent literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science databases. Articles were divided into one to five fractions groups. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality of studies. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were presented for the included studies and a pooled value was calculated by the weighted average.
Results: The 38 included studies comprised 3,754 patients with 4,731 lesions. The average 1-year LCs for the one to five fractions were 92.7%, 84.6%, 86.8%, 82.6%, and 80.6%, respectively. The average 1-year OS for the one to five fractions were 53.0%, 70.4%, 60.1%, 48%, and 80%, respectively. The 24 Gy/single fraction scheme had a higher 1-year LC (98.1%) than those of 24 Gy/two fractions (85.4%), 27 Gy/three fractions (84.9%), and 24 Gy/three fractions (89.0%). The incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 10.3%, with 10.7% in the single-fraction group and 10.1% in the multi-fraction group. The incidence of radiation-induced myelopathy was 0.19%; three and two patients were treated with single-fraction and multi-fraction SBRT, respectively. The incidence of radiculopathy was 0.30% and all but one patient were treated with multi-fraction SBRT.
Conclusions: SBRT provided satisfactory efficacy and acceptable safety for spinal metastases. Single-fraction SBRT demonstrated a higher local control rate than those of the other factions, especially the 24 Gy dose. The risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) was slightly higher in single-fraction SBRT and more patients developed radiculopathy after multi-fraction SBRT.
Keywords: multi-fraction; single-fraction; spinal metastases; stereotactic body radiotherapy; stereotactic radiosurgery; systematic review.
© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that there is no conflict of interest to this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Re-irradiation stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional outcome analysis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):646-653. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151523. Epub 2016 Jun 24. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27341054
-
Vertebral compression fractures after stereotactic body radiation therapy: a large, multi-institutional, multinational evaluation.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):928-36. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE141261. Epub 2016 Feb 19. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 26895526
-
Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy for renal cell cancer spinal metastases: analysis of outcomes and risk of vertebral compression fracture.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Nov;21(5):711-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13895. Epub 2014 Aug 29. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 25170656
-
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases: a review of 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions.J Neurooncol. 2023 May;163(1):15-27. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04327-1. Epub 2023 May 8. J Neurooncol. 2023. PMID: 37155133 Review.
-
A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases.J Neurooncol. 2025 Jan;171(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4. Epub 2024 Nov 11. J Neurooncol. 2025. PMID: 39527381 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Intertarget Distances on Single-Isocenter Radiotherapy Plans with jaw-Tracking and jaw-Fixed Techniques for Vertebral Metastases.Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan-Dec;24:15330338251332386. doi: 10.1177/15330338251332386. Epub 2025 Apr 11. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2025. PMID: 40211791 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of radiotherapy on local control and overall survival in spinal metastasis of non-small-cell lung cancer after surgery and systemic therapy.Bone Jt Open. 2024 Apr 23;5(4):350-360. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2024-0037.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2024. PMID: 38649150 Free PMC article.
-
Only Tumors Angiographically Identified as Hypervascular Exhibit Lower Intraoperative Blood Loss Upon Selective Preoperative Embolization of Spinal Metastases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 19;10:597476. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.597476. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33585214 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a Dedicated Software "Elements™ Spine SRS, Brainlab®" for Target Volume Definition in the Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastases With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.Front Oncol. 2022 May 12;12:827195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827195. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35646624 Free PMC article.
-
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review.Med Oncol. 2022 May 23;39(5):103. doi: 10.1007/s12032-021-01613-8. Med Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35599266 Review.
References
-
- Witham TF, Khavkin YA, Gallia GL, Wolinsky J‐P, Gokaslan ZL. Surgery insight: current management of epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic spine disease. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2:87‐94; quiz 116. - PubMed
-
- Klimo P Jr, Kestle JR, Schmidt MH. Clinical trials and evidence‐based medicine for metastatic spine disease. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2004;15:549‐564. - PubMed
-
- Kumar N, Tan K‐A, Tan JH, et al. The influence of histologic subtype in predicting survival of lung cancer patients with spinal metastases. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31:E1‐E7. - PubMed
-
- Rades D, Veninga T, Stalpers L, et al. Outcome after radiotherapy alone for metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:50‐56. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources