Early Self-directed Home Exercise Program After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Pilot Study
- PMID: 31490861
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003239
Early Self-directed Home Exercise Program After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Study design: Pilot randomized controlled trial.
Objective: To examine the acceptability and preliminary safety and outcome effects of an early self-directed home exercise program (HEP) performed within the first 6 weeks after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
Summary of background data: Little is known regarding optimal postoperative management after ACDF.
Methods: Thirty patients (mean ± standard deviation, age = 50.6 ± 11.0 years, 16 women) undergoing ACDF were randomized to receive an early HEP (n = 15) or usual care (n = 15). The early HEP was a 6-week self-directed program with weekly supportive telephone calls to reduce pain and improve activity. Treatment acceptability was assessed after the intervention period (6 weeks after surgery). Safety (adverse events, radiographic fusion, revision surgery) was determined at routine postoperative visits. Disability (Neck Disability Index), pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale for neck and arm pain), physical and mental health (SF-12), and opioid use were assessed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months after surgery by an evaluator blinded to group assignment.
Results: Participants reported high levels of acceptability and no serious adverse events with the early HEP. No difference in fusion rate was observed between groups (P > 0.05) and no participants underwent revision surgery. The early self-directed HEP group reported lower 6-week neck pain than the usual care group (F = 3.3, P = 0.04, r = 0.3, mean difference = -1.7 [-3.4; -0.05]) and lower proportion of individuals (13% vs. 47%) using opioids at 12 months (P = 0.05). No other between-group outcome differences were observed (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: An early self-directed HEP program was acceptable to patients and has the potential to be safely administered to patients immediately after ACDF. Benefits were noted for short-term neck pain and long-term opioid utilization. However, larger trials are needed to confirm safety with standardized and long-term radiograph assessment and treatment efficacy.
Level of evidence: 2.
References
-
- Marquez-Lara A, Nandyala SV, Fineberg SJ, et al. Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:476–481.
-
- Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, et al. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38:1226–1232.
-
- Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE, et al. Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009; 34:955–961. discussion 62–63.
-
- Martin CT, D’Oro A, Buser Z, et al. Trends and costs of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison of inpatient and outpatient procedures. Iowa Orthop J 2018; 38:167–176.
-
- Nesterenko SO, Riley LH 3rd, Skolasky RL. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: current state and trends in treatment for cervical disc pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37:1470–1474.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials