Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):1236.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7558-7.

Acceptability and potential impact of delivering sexual health promotion information through social media and dating apps to MSM in England: a qualitative study

Joanna M Kesten  1   2   3 , Kaiseree Dias  4 , Fiona Burns  5   6 , Paul Crook  7   8 , Alison Howarth  5 , Catherine H Mercer  5   9 , Alison Rodger  9 , Ian Simms  8 , Isabel Oliver  10   7   8 , Matthew Hickman  10   4 , Gwenda Hughes  8   9 , Peter Weatherburn  9   11
Affiliations

Acceptability and potential impact of delivering sexual health promotion information through social media and dating apps to MSM in England: a qualitative study

Joanna M Kesten et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Increasing rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) in England is a pressing public health concern. Interventions targeting MSM, including information provision that effectively promotes sexual health, are needed. To support such intervention development, it is necessary to understand acceptable ways of delivering sexual health information. We explored the acceptability and potential uses and impacts of delivering sexual health information to MSM through social media and geosocial networking apps or dating apps.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in person or by telephone with 25 MSM resident in England recruited via dating apps and social media advertisements. Interviews explored sexual health information sources, perceptions and uses. Attitudes towards sexual health promotion through social media and dating apps were then discussed. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Sexual health information delivery through social media and dating apps was considered acceptable. Receiving information when browsing social media was viewed positively by most, as people have time to absorb information. In contrast, concerns were expressed that sharing or commenting on social media sexual health information may lead to judgements and discrimination. While social media reaches a high proportion of the population, dating apps can easily target MSM. However, tensions exist between the ability to provide information at an opportune time through dating apps, when users are connecting with new sexual partners, with the potential to adversely affect the app user's experience. Hypothetical and actual uses and impacts of sexual health information ranged from no impact to reading information, sharing with peers, and increased awareness, to influencing healthcare-seeking, decision-making and risk-taking behaviours. Ensuring that information is engaging, positive in tone, not too clinical, focused on building social norms and delivered by trusted organisations were viewed as important for supporting its use.

Conclusions: Overall, these findings support the development of new interventions that use dating apps and social media for sexual health promotion.

Keywords: Acceptability; Dating apps; Men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM); Qualitative research; Sexual health information; Social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Joanna May Kesten is a member of the editorial board of BMC Public Health. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Public Health England . In: Sexually transmitted infections and chlamydia screening in England, 2017. England PH, editor. 2018.
    1. Public Health England. Update on the epidemiology of shigella in adults in London: 2012 to 2016: Gov. London; 2017.
    1. Hughes G, Field N. The epidemiology of sexually transmitted infections in the UK: impact of behavior, services and interventions. Future Microbiol. 2015;10(1):35–51. doi: 10.2217/fmb.14.110. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel VV, Ginsburg Z, Golub SA, Horvath KJ, Rios N, Mayer KH, et al. Empowering with PrEP (E-PrEP), a peer-led social media–based intervention to facilitate HIV Preexposure prophylaxis adoption among young Black and Latinx gay and bisexual men: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled. Trial. 2018;7(8):e11375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simms I, Wallace L, Thomas DR, Emmett L, Shankar AG, Vinson M, et al. Recent outbreaks of infectious syphilis, United Kingdom, January 2012 to April 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19:24. - PubMed