Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation
- PMID: 31492443
- DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.005
Practical robustness evaluation in radiotherapy - A photon and proton-proof alternative to PTV-based plan evaluation
Abstract
Background and purpose: A planning target volume (PTV) in photon treatments aims to ensure that the clinical target volume (CTV) receives adequate dose despite treatment uncertainties. The underlying static dose cloud approximation (the assumption that the dose distribution is invariant to errors) is problematic in intensity modulated proton treatments where range errors should be taken into account as well. The purpose of this work is to introduce a robustness evaluation method that is applicable to photon and proton treatments and is consistent with (historic) PTV-based treatment plan evaluations.
Materials and methods: The limitation of the static dose cloud approximation was solved in a multi-scenario simulation by explicitly calculating doses for various treatment scenarios that describe possible errors in the treatment course. Setup errors were the same as the CTV-PTV margin and the underlying theory of 3D probability density distributions was extended to 4D to include range errors, maintaining a 90% confidence level. Scenario dose distributions were reduced to voxel-wise minimum and maximum dose distributions; the first to evaluate CTV coverage and the second for hot spots. Acceptance criteria for CTV D98 and D2 were calibrated against PTV-based criteria from historic photon treatment plans.
Results: CTV D98 in worst case scenario dose and voxel-wise minimum dose showed a very strong correlation with scenario average D98 (R2 > 0.99). The voxel-wise minimum dose visualised CTV dose conformity and coverage in 3D in agreement with PTV-based evaluation in photon therapy. Criteria for CTV D98 and D2 of the voxel-wise minimum and maximum dose showed very strong correlations to PTV D98 and D2 (R2 > 0.99) and on average needed corrections of -0.9% and +2.3%, respectively.
Conclusions: A practical approach to robustness evaluation was provided and clinically implemented for PTV-less photon and proton treatment planning, consistent with PTV evaluations but without its static dose cloud approximation.
Keywords: Margins; Photon therapy; Proton therapy; Range error; Robustness evaluation; Setup error.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.Radiother Oncol. 2023 Sep;186:109729. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109729. Epub 2023 Jun 8. Radiother Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37301261
-
Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.Med Phys. 2013 May;40(5):051711. doi: 10.1118/1.4801899. Med Phys. 2013. PMID: 23635259 Free PMC article.
-
Robustness analysis of CTV and OAR dose in clinical PBS-PT of neuro-oncological tumors: prescription-dose calibration and inter-patient variation with the Dutch proton robustness evaluation protocol.Phys Med Biol. 2023 Aug 23;68(17). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acead1. Phys Med Biol. 2023. PMID: 37494944
-
Robust radiotherapy planning.Phys Med Biol. 2018 Nov 12;63(22):22TR02. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae659. Phys Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 30418942 Review.
-
Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 May;19(3):19-26. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12291. Epub 2018 Mar 10. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018. PMID: 29524301 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Definition of a framework for volumetric modulated arc therapy plan quality assessment with integration of dose-, complexity-, and robustness metrics.Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Nov 29;32:100685. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100685. eCollection 2024 Oct. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39717184 Free PMC article.
-
Worst-Case Robustness Evaluation Methods for IMPT: A Critical Comparison.Int J Part Ther. 2025 Aug 5;17:101199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2025.101199. eCollection 2025 Sep. Int J Part Ther. 2025. PMID: 40831742 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of robust radiobiological optimization algorithms based on the mixed beam model for intensity-modulated carbon-ion therapy.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 28;18(7):e0288545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288545. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37506069 Free PMC article.
-
A planning approach for online adaptive proton therapy to cope with cone beam computed tomography inaccuracies.Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Mar 20;34:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100752. eCollection 2025 Apr. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40213031 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical workflow for reirradiation: national consensus recommendations on imaging, treatment planning, dose accumulation, and treatment delivery.Acta Oncol. 2025 Jul 24;64:946-956. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43567. Acta Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40704773 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources