Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in adults with coeliac disease exposed to gluten challenge: a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
- PMID: 31494096
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30264-X
Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in adults with coeliac disease exposed to gluten challenge: a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Abstract
Background: Interleukin 15 (IL-15) is implicated in the pathophysiology of coeliac disease. AMG 714 is the first anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody to be investigated for the treatment of coeliac disease. We aimed to investigate the effects of AMG 714 in patients with coeliac disease who underwent gluten challenge.
Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2a trial was done at three clinical sites in Finland. Inclusion criteria included age 18-80 years, a confirmed diagnosis of coeliac disease, and adherence to a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months before screening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 150 mg AMG 714, 300 mg AMG 714, or placebo using permuted blocks and stratified by study site and sex. Patients and study staff were masked to treatment assignment. Treatments were administered by two subcutaneous injections every 2 weeks for 10 weeks (total six doses). Patients without severe villous atrophy at baseline received a gluten challenge (2-4 g daily) during weeks 2-12. Small bowel biopsy samples were obtained for histological assessments at baseline and week 12. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change from baseline to week 12 in villous height-to-crypt depth (VHCD) ratio. Secondary endpoints were CD3-positive intraepithelial lymphocyte density; clinical symptoms measured by gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), coeliac disease GSRS, and Bristol stool form scale (BSFS); and changes in anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies from baseline. The primary analysis was done in the per-protocol 1 population of patients who received at least one dose of study drug and who underwent the gluten challenge. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02637141 and EudraCT, 2015-003647-19.
Findings: Between April 13, 2016, and Nov 22, 2016, 64 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the 150 mg AMG 714 group (n=22), the 300 mg AMG 714 group (n=22), or the placebo group (n=20). Two patients did not start treatment and two did not provide post-treatment biopsy samples. 49 patients underwent the gluten challenge (per-protocol 1 population) and 11 patients did not because of baseline villous atrophy. AMG 714 did not prevent mucosal injury due to gluten challenge. The least square mean difference in the relative change from baseline in VHCD ratio was -2·49% (95% CI -16·82 to 11·83; p=0·73) between 150 mg AMG 714 and placebo and 6·39% (-7·07 to 19·85; p=0·34) between 300 mg AMG 714 and placebo. Neither comparison was statistically significant. The density of CD3-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes increased in all groups, with smaller increases in the 300 mg group (-41·24% [95% CI -79·28 to -3·20] vs placebo, nominal p=0·03) but not the 150 mg group (-14·32% [-54·39 to 25·74], nominal p=0·47). Clinical symptoms were ameliorated with AMG 714 treatment between baseline and week 12, particularly diarrhoea as measured by the BSFS (nominal p=0·01 for 150 mg vs placebo, and nominal p=0·0002 for 300 mg vs placebo). Serum antibody titres for anti-tTG and anti-DGP antibodies increased in all three treatment groups, with no significant difference between AMG 714 and placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 21 (95%) patients in the 150 mg AMG 714 group, 0 (95%) in the 300 mg AMG 714 group, and 19 (100%) in the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (17 [77%] participants in the 150 mg AMG 714 group, 16 [76%] in the 300 mg AMG 714 group, and 13 [68%] in the placebo group). Injection site reactions were the most common individual adverse event, reported in eight (36%) patients in the 150 mg AMG 714 group, 11 (52%) in the 300 mg group, and five (26%) in the placebo group. No serious adverse events occurred.
Interpretation: The primary endpoint, change in VHCD ratio from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with coeliac disease undergoing gluten challenge, was not significantly different between placebo and AMG 714 at either 150 mg or 300 mg. Effects on intraepithelial lymphocyte density and symptoms suggest that further research of AMG 714 may be warranted in patients with non-responsive coeliac disease.
Funding: Celimmune and Amgen.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Blocking interleukin 15: a light at the end of the tunnel?Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;4(12):896-898. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30293-6. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31494099 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in patients with type 2 refractory coeliac disease: a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;4(12):960-970. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30265-1. Epub 2019 Sep 4. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31494097 Clinical Trial.
-
Epitope-specific immunotherapy targeting CD4-positive T cells in coeliac disease: two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 studies.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;2(7):479-493. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30110-3. Epub 2017 May 11. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28506538 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of gluten peptide-based antigen-specific immunotherapy (Nexvax2) in adults with coeliac disease after bolus exposure to gluten (RESET CeD): an interim analysis of a terminated randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 May;8(5):446-457. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00428-9. Epub 2023 Mar 7. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 36898393 Clinical Trial.
-
Larazotide acetate for treatment of celiac disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan;46(1):101782. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101782. Epub 2021 Jul 31. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 34339872
-
Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Different Gluten Doses and Risk of Coeliac Disease Relapse.Nutrients. 2023 Mar 14;15(6):1390. doi: 10.3390/nu15061390. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 36986121 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Old and New Adjunctive Therapies in Celiac Disease and Refractory Celiac Disease: A Review.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Aug 15;24(16):12800. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612800. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37628981 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Novel Therapies for Celiac Disease: A Clinical Review Article.Cureus. 2023 May 14;15(5):e39004. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39004. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37323330 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Celiac disease: mechanisms and emerging therapeutics.Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Dec;44(12):949-962. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 14. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37839914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Celiac Disease: Beyond Diet and Food Awareness.Foods. 2025 Jan 24;14(3):377. doi: 10.3390/foods14030377. Foods. 2025. PMID: 39941971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunopathogenesis and environmental triggers in coeliac disease.Gut. 2022 Jul 25;71(11):2337-49. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326257. Online ahead of print. Gut. 2022. PMID: 35879049 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous