Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 1:204:107536.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.038. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

Impact of a community-based naloxone distribution program on opioid overdose death rates

Rebecca B Naumann  1 , Christine Piette Durrance  2 , Shabbar I Ranapurwala  3 , Anna E Austin  4 , Scott Proescholdbell  5 , Robert Childs  6 , Stephen W Marshall  7 , Susan Kansagra  8 , Meghan E Shanahan  9
Affiliations

Impact of a community-based naloxone distribution program on opioid overdose death rates

Rebecca B Naumann et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Background: In August 2013, a naloxone distribution program was implemented in North Carolina (NC). This study evaluated that program by quantifying the association between the program and county-level opioid overdose death (OOD) rates and conducting a cost-benefit analysis.

Methods: One-group pre-post design. Data included annual county-level counts of naloxone kits distributed from 2013 to 2016 and mortality data from 2000-2016. We used generalized estimating equations to estimate the association between cumulative rates of naloxone kits distributed and annual OOD rates. Costs included naloxone kit purchases and distribution costs; benefits were quantified as OODs avoided and monetized using a conservative value of a life.

Results: The rate of OOD in counties with 1-100 cumulative naloxone kits distributed per 100,000 population was 0.90 times (95% CI: 0.78, 1.04) that of counties that had not received kits. In counties that received >100 cumulative kits per 100,000 population, the OOD rate was 0.88 times (95% CI: 0.76, 1.02) that of counties that had not received kits. By December 2016, an estimated 352 NC deaths were avoided by naloxone distribution (95% CI: 189, 580). On average, for every dollar spent on the program, there was $2742 of benefit due to OODs avoided (95% CI: $1,237, $4882).

Conclusions: Our estimates suggest that community-based naloxone distribution is associated with lower OOD rates. The program generated substantial societal benefits due to averted OODs. States and communities should continue to support efforts to increase naloxone access, which may include reducing legal, financial, and normative barriers.

Keywords: Harm reduction; Naloxone; Narcotic; Opioid; Overdose.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bennett AS, Bell A, Doe-Simkins M, Elliott L, Pouget E, Davis C, 2018. From peers to lay bystanders: findings from a decade of naloxone distribution in Pittsburgh, PA. J. Psychoactive Drugs 50, 240–246. - PubMed
    1. Bennett T, Holloway K, 2012. The impact of take-home naloxone distribution and training on opiate overdose knowledge and response: an evaluation of the THN project in Wales. Drugs 19, 320–328.
    1. Bird SM, Parmar MKB, Strang J, 2015. Take-home naloxone to prevent fatalities from opiate-overdose: Protocol for Scotland’s public health policy evaluation, and a new measure to assess impact. Drugs Educ. Prev. Pol. 22, 66–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2018. Understanding the epidemic: 3 waves of the rise in opioid overdose deaths. Atlanta, GA: CDC. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html. Accessed on April 12, 2019.
    1. Coffin PO, Sullivan SD, 2013. Cost-effectiveness of distributing naloxone to heroin users for lay overdose reversal. Ann. Intern. Med 158, 1–9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms