Comparison of emergency department to hospital antibiograms: Influence of patient risk factors on susceptibility
- PMID: 31495521
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158403
Comparison of emergency department to hospital antibiograms: Influence of patient risk factors on susceptibility
Abstract
Objectives: Traditional antibiograms use local resistance patterns and susceptibility data to guide empiric antimicrobial therapy selection. However, antibiograms are rarely unit-specific and do not account for patient-specific risk factors.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center descriptive study used culture and susceptibility data from January 1 to December 31, 2016 to develop an Emergency Department (ED)-specific antibiogram and compare the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the most commonly identified organisms to the hospital antibiogram. All ED isolates were further stratified by the following risk factors that may influence antimicrobial susceptibility: age, disposition from ED, previous antimicrobial use and/or hospitalization within 30 days, and presenting location (i.e. healthcare facility residence versus community).
Results: A total of 2158 isolates from the ED were included: Escherichia coli (n = 1244), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 232), Proteus mirabilis (n = 131), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 103), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 303), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 145). There were no statistically significant differences between the ED and hospital antibiogram (n = 5739) with the exception of Escherichia coli. The hospital antibiogram overestimated Escherichia coli resistance rates for cefazolin (20% vs 15.6%, p = 0.049), ceftriaxone (9.6% vs 6.4%, p < 0.033), and ciprofloxacin (23.7% vs 15.4%, p < 0.006). There were significantly more risk factors present in patients admitted versus discharged from the ED (p < 0.001). Healthcare facility residence had the greatest influence on susceptibility, especially Escherichia coli (81.8% vs 34.9%, p < 0.001) and Proteus mirabilis (75.3% vs 33%, p < 0.001) ciprofloxacin susceptibility.
Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between the ED and hospital antibiogram with the exception of Escherichia coli. However, development of an ED-specific antibiogram can aid physicians in prescribing appropriate empiric therapy when risk factors are included.
Keywords: Antibiogram; Antimicrobial resistance; Antimicrobial stewardship; Antimicrobial susceptibility; Emergency department; Logistic regression.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest All authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to report.
Similar articles
-
Development of a urinary-specific antibiogram for gram-negative isolates: impact of patient risk factors on susceptibility.Am J Infect Control. 2014 Apr;42(4):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.11.004. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Am J Infect Control. 2014. PMID: 24559594
-
Comparison of bacteria isolated from emergency department patients versus hospitalized patients.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Dec 1;70(23):2124-8. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130079. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013. PMID: 24249762
-
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli in uncomplicated cystitis in the emergency department: is the hospital antibiogram an effective treatment guide?Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(8):998-1000. doi: 10.1111/acem.12729. Acad Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 26250654
-
Using rapid diagnostic tests to optimize antimicrobial selection in antimicrobial stewardship programs.Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Aug;32(8):677-87. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01137.x. Pharmacotherapy. 2012. PMID: 23307517 Review.
-
Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility pattern of clinical isolates from the pediatric intensive care unit in a single medical center - 6 years' experience.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2009 Apr;42(2):160-5. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2009. PMID: 19597649 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical