Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement
- PMID: 31495770
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.07.004
Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement
Abstract
Background: Surgical venous cutdown is a method for totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) insertion. The main drawback of this technique is its higher failure rate when compared with the percutaneous approach, which is mostly related to anatomic variations of the cephalic vein. The aim of this study was to assess preoperative ultrasound imaging as a tool to predict cephalic vein cutdown failure for TIVAD insertion.
Methods: Ultrasound and operative reports of a cohort of patients undergoing TIVAD insertion by cephalic vein cutdown were reviewed. Ultrasound venous (vein visibility, diameter, length, subcutaneous depth, vein path, and subclavian junction visibility) and patient variables were tested by logistic regression as predictors of TIVAD insertion failure.
Results: One hundred sixty consecutive patients underwent cephalic vein cutdown for attempted TIVAD insertion. An inability to visualize the vein on the preoperative ultrasound examination (odds ratio, 4.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.57-12.30; P < .05) and depth of the vein (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.15; P = .042) were predictors of failure of TIVAD insertion by cephalic vein cutdown.
Conclusions: Preoperative ultrasound examination allows identifying patients at risk of failure of TIVAD insertion by cephalic vein cutdown. Preoperative ultrasound examination constitutes an efficient tool for choosing the most appropriate surgical approach and improving patient comfort.
Keywords: Cephalic vein; Implantable port; Ultrasound; Venous access.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Routine chest X-ray is not mandatory after fluoroscopy-guided totally implantable venous access device insertion.Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;28(2):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Dec 17. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24360633
-
A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown.Am Surg. 2018 Jun 1;84(6):841-843. Am Surg. 2018. PMID: 29981612
-
External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul;12(7):570-3. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.04.028. Epub 2005 May 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15889215
-
External jugular vein approach for TIVAD implantation: first choice or only an alternative? A review of the literature.J Vasc Access. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):1-4. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000287. Epub 2014 Sep 2. J Vasc Access. 2015. PMID: 25198827 Review.
-
Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun;22(6):1705-14. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2208-1. Support Care Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24659216 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical technique: placement of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through a cephalic vein cutdown in pediatric patients.Transl Pediatr. 2024 Oct 1;13(10):1820-1827. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-305. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Transl Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39524387 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources