Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature
- PMID: 31496622
- PMCID: PMC6710171
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4427
Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature
Abstract
Some controversy surrounds the postoperative feeding regimen utilized in patients who undergo esophagectomy. Variation in practices during the perioperative period exists including the type of nutrition started, the delivery route, and its timing. Adequate nutrition is essential for this patient population as these patients often present with weight loss and have altered eating patterns after surgery, which can affect their ability to regain or maintain weight. Methods of feeding after an esophagectomy include total parenteral nutrition, nasoduodenal/nasojejunal tube feeding, jejunostomy tube feeding, and oral feeding. Recent evidence suggests that early oral feeding is associated with shorter LOS, faster return of bowel function, and improved quality of life. Enhanced recovery pathways after surgery pathways after esophagectomy with a component of early oral feeding also seem to be safe, feasible, and cost-effective, albeit with limited data. However, data on anastomotic leaks is mixed, and some studies suggest that the incidence of leaks may be higher with early oral feeding. This risk of anastomotic leak with early feeding may be heavily modulated by surgical approach. No definitive data is currently available to definitively answer this question, and further studies should look at how these early feeding regimens vary by surgical technique. This review aims to discuss the existing literature on the optimal route and timing of feeding after esophagectomy.
Keywords: Delayed feeding; Early feeding; Enteral nutrition; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Jejunostomy tube; Oral feeding; Postoperative complications.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest. No financial support.
Similar articles
-
A Meta-analysis of Jejunostomy Versus Nasoenteral Tube for Enteral Nutrition Following Esophagectomy.J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:553-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.027. Epub 2021 Apr 14. J Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33864963
-
Routes for early enteral nutrition after esophagectomy. A systematic review.Clin Nutr. 2015 Feb;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Clin Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25131601
-
Routine placement of feeding jejunostomy tube during esophagectomy increases postoperative complications and does not improve postoperative malnutrition.Dis Esophagus. 2020 Jan 16;33(1):doz021. doi: 10.1093/dote/doz021. Dis Esophagus. 2020. PMID: 30997494
-
Timing of oral intake after esophagectomy: A narrative review of the literature and case report.Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;37(3):536-554. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10777. Epub 2021 Oct 4. Nutr Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 34608676 Review.
-
Benefits versus risks: a prospective audit. Feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy.World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1432-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0019-1. World J Surg. 2009. PMID: 19387726
Cited by
-
Risk Factors for Failure of Direct Oral Feeding Following a Totally Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.Nutrients. 2021 Oct 15;13(10):3616. doi: 10.3390/nu13103616. Nutrients. 2021. PMID: 34684617 Free PMC article.
-
Nationwide medical database study for postoperative nutritional management in patients undergoing gastroenterological cancer surgery.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Nov 27;9(3):595-607. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12892. eCollection 2025 May. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024. PMID: 40385337 Free PMC article.
-
Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2022 Apr;30(4):3473-3483. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06813-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11. Support Care Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35015134
-
Therapeutic Effect and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Three Different Nutritional Schemes for Esophageal Cancer Patients in the Early Post-operative Period.Front Nutr. 2021 Jun 17;8:651596. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.651596. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34222299 Free PMC article.
-
Rehabilitation Management for a Patient with Bilateral Pneumothorax after Surgery for Esophageal Cancer.Prog Rehabil Med. 2022 Apr 7;7:20220017. doi: 10.2490/prm.20220017. eCollection 2022. Prog Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID: 35434404 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Biere SS, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg. 2011;28:29–35. - PubMed
-
- Swisher SG, Deford L, Merriman KW, Walsh GL, Smythe R, Vaporicyan A, Ajani JA, Brown T, Komaki R, Roth JA, Putnam JB. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:1126–1132. - PubMed
-
- Kingma BF, Steenhagen E, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Nutritional aspects of enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116:623–629. - PubMed
-
- Wischmeyer PE, Carli F, Evans DC, Guilbert S, Kozar R, Pryor A, Thiele RH, Everett S, Grocott M, Gan TJ, Shaw AD, Thacker JKM, Miller TE, Hedrick TL, McEvoy MD, Mythen MG, Bergamaschi R, Gupta R, Holubar SD, Senagore AJ, Abola RE, Bennett-Guerrero E, Kent ML, Feldman LS, Fiore JF, Jr Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) 2 Workgroup. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Nutrition Screening and Therapy Within a Surgical Enhanced Recovery Pathway. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1883–1895. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical