Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Aug 7:15:283-290.
doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S210928. eCollection 2019.

The role of precise imaging with intravascular ultrasound in coronary and peripheral interventions

Nicolas W Shammas  1 , Qais Radaideh  1 , W John Shammas  1 , Ghassan E Daher  1 , Rayan Jo Rachwan  1 , Yazan Radaideh  1
Affiliations
Review

The role of precise imaging with intravascular ultrasound in coronary and peripheral interventions

Nicolas W Shammas et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. .

Abstract

Angiography remains a widely utilized imaging modality during vascular procedures. Angiography, however, has its limitations by underestimating the true vessel size, plaque morphology, presence of calcium and thrombus, plaque vulnerability, true lesion length, stent expansion and apposition, residual narrowing post intervention and the presence or absence of dissections. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has emerged as an important adjunctive modality to angiography. IVUS offers precise imaging of the vessel size, plaque morphology and the presence of dissections and guides interventional procedures including stent sizing, assessing residual narrowing and stent apposition and expansion. IVUS-guided treatment has shown to yield superior outcomes when compared to angiography-only guided therapy. The cost-effectiveness of the routine use of IVUS during vascular procedures needs to be further studied.

Keywords: coronary artery disease; dissections; intravascular ultrasound; peripheral artery disease; plaque morphology; stent apposition; thrombus; vessel size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Shammas receives educational and research grants from Boston Scientific, Intact Vascular, Bard, VentureMed Group, Phillips and is on the speaker bureau of Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Zoll Medical. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Severe 360-degree calcium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Thrombus. Note: The arrow represents the thrombus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Multiple dissections seen on intravascular ultrasound that are not visible on angiogram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kruger RA, Mistretta CA, Crummy AB, et al. Digital K-edge subtraction radiography. Radiology. 1977;125(1):243–245. doi:10.1148/125.1.243 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arthurs ZM. The evaluation of peripheral vascular disease with intrascular ultrasound. Vasc Dis Manag. 2011;8(4):E81–E86.
    1. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1478–1492. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01175-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcìa-Garcìa HM, Gogas BD, Serruys PW, Bruining N. IVUS-based imaging modalities for tissue characterization: similarities and differences. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:215–224. doi:10.1007/s10554-010-9789-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–235. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1002358 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms