Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug;11(4):215-222.
doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.215. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Influence of polishing systems on roughness and color change of two dental ceramics

Affiliations

Influence of polishing systems on roughness and color change of two dental ceramics

Lucas Campagnaro Maciel et al. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the polishing effect on roughness and color change of pressed and layering ceramics after immersion in coffee solution.

Materials and methods: 88 ceramic discs (1.0 mm × 10.0 mm) were manufactured - 44 nano-fluorapatite layering ceramics (IPS e.max Ceram. Group C) and 44 pressed lithium disilicate ceramic discs (IPS e. max Press - Group P). Each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to surface treatments: (G) Glaze, (S) Shofu polishing system (Shofu Inc.), (E) Edenta AG polishing System, (KG) 30-µm diamond granulation tip. Surface roughness (Ra) and color change (ΔE) measurings after the surface treatments were performed, before and 12 days after the immersion in coffee solution. A samples' qualitative analysis was conducted with a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were statistically-treated with one-way-ANOVA and Duncan's tests, apart from paired t-test and Pearson's correlation test (α=5%).

Results: The decrescent order, both for surface roughness (Ra) and ΔE for both ceramics were: KG > E > S > G (P<.05). With exception for PG and CG subgroups, which did not present statistical difference between them, all other pressed ceramics subgroups presented smaller Ra values and greater ΔE values than the layering ceramics subgroups (P<.05).

Conclusion: Although mechanical polishing systems presented intermediate Ra values, their colors were considered clinically acceptable. There is a strong correlation between the surface roughness and the color change of tested ceramics.

Keywords: Ceramics; Dental restoration; Pigmentation; Spectrophotometry; Surface roughness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Experimental sketch. Ceramics and surface treatments applied in this study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscopy (× 1,000) of layering ceramics (C Group) and pressed ceramics (P Group) after different surface treatments: (G) Glaze, (S) Shofu Inc polishing system, (E) Edenta AG polishing system and (KG) 30 µm diamond tip.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Pearson correlation analysis. Graph of dispersal between the surface roughness (Ra) and the color change (ΔE) in Group C.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Pearson correlation analysis. Graph of dispersal between the surface roughness (Ra) and the color change (ΔE) in Group P.

References

    1. Höland W, Rheinberger V, Apel E, Ritzberger C, Rothbrust F, Kappert H, Krumeich F, Nesper R. Future perspectives of biomaterials for dental restoration. J European Ceram Soc. 2009;29:1291–1297.
    1. Bayne SC, Ferracane JL, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, van Noort R. The evolution of dental materials over the past century: Silver and gold to tooth color and beyond. J Dent Res. 2019;98:257–265. - PubMed
    1. de Kok P, Pereira GKR, Fraga S, de Jager N, Venturini AB, Kleverlaan CJ. The effect of internal roughness and bonding on the fracture resistance and structural reliability of lithium disilicate ceramic. Dent Mater. 2017;33:1416–1425. - PubMed
    1. Dalkiz M, Sipahi C, Beydemir B. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:217–222. - PubMed
    1. Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J. 2011;56:84–96. - PubMed