Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 2:7:24.
doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0171-7. eCollection 2019.

Integrating the influence of weather into mechanistic models of butterfly movement

Affiliations

Integrating the influence of weather into mechanistic models of butterfly movement

Luke C Evans et al. Mov Ecol. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding the factors influencing movement is essential to forecasting species persistence in a changing environment. Movement is often studied using mechanistic models, extrapolating short-term observations of individuals to longer-term predictions, but the role of weather variables such as air temperature and solar radiation, key determinants of ectotherm activity, are generally neglected. We aim to show how the effects of weather can be incorporated into individual-based models of butterfly movement thus allowing analysis of their effects.

Methods: We constructed a mechanistic movement model and calibrated it with high precision movement data on a widely studied species of butterfly, the meadow brown (Maniola jurtina), collected over a 21-week period at four sites in southern England. Day time temperatures during the study ranged from 14.5 to 31.5 °C and solar radiation from heavy cloud to bright sunshine. The effects of weather are integrated into the individual-based model through weather-dependent scaling of parametric distributions representing key behaviours: the durations of flight and periods of inactivity.

Results: Flight speed was unaffected by weather, time between successive flights increased as solar radiation decreased, and flight duration showed a unimodal response to air temperature that peaked between approximately 23 °C and 26 °C. After validation, the model demonstrated that weather alone can produce a more than two-fold difference in predicted weekly displacement.

Conclusions: Individual Based models provide a useful framework for integrating the effect of weather into movement models. By including weather effects we are able to explain a two-fold difference in movement rate of M. jurtina consistent with inter-annual variation in dispersal measured in population studies. Climate change for the studied populations is expected to decrease activity and dispersal rates since these butterflies already operate close to their thermal optimum.

Keywords: Body temperature; Climate warming; Lepidoptera; Motivation; Thermoregulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual model of the IBM. Solid boxes represent model processes, diamonds decision points, and ovals data input to the model. Condition dependence of data input is indicated by dashed boxes. The model runs on a one-second time step
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Step distances with relative turning angle inset for a) males; b) females
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a) Flight durations across temperature categories; b) inter-flight durations across solar-radiation categories. Male butterflies shown as solid circles, females as open circles
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of model predictions with observations of distance rate for males and females a) sunshine categories and b) Temperature categories. Male butterflies shown as solid circles, females as open circles
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Predicted mean weekly displacements (m) for a given combination of solar radiation and air temperature for a) Males and b) Females

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanski I. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 1998;396:41–49. doi: 10.1038/23876. - DOI
    1. Bonte D, Van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, et al. Costs of dispersal. Biol Rev Wiley Online Library. 2012;87:290–312. - PubMed
    1. Doherty TS, Driscoll DA. Coupling movement and landscape ecology for animal conservation in production landscapes. Proceedings Biol Sci The Royal Society. 2018;285:20172272. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2272. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lima SL, Zollner PA. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:131–135. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)81094-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevens VM, Whitmee S, Le Galliard J-F, Clobert J, Böhning-Gaese K, Bonte D, et al. A comparative analysis of dispersal syndromes in terrestrial and semi-terrestrial animals. Chase J, editor. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:1039–1052. doi: 10.1111/ele.12303. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources