Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 16;4(Suppl 8):e001482.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001482. eCollection 2019.

Research gaps in the organisation of primary healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries and ways to address them: a mixed-methods approach

Affiliations

Research gaps in the organisation of primary healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries and ways to address them: a mixed-methods approach

Felicity Goodyear-Smith et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Since the Alma-Ata Declaration 40 years ago, primary healthcare (PHC) has made great advances, but there is insufficient research on models of care and outcomes-particularly for low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Systematic efforts to identify these gaps and develop evidence-based strategies for improvement in LMICs has been lacking. We report on a global effort to identify and prioritise the knowledge needs of PHC practitioners and researchers in LMICs about PHC organisation.

Methods: Three-round modified Delphi using web-based surveys. PHC practitioners and academics and policy-makers from LMICs sampled from global networks. First round (pre-Delphi survey) collated possible research questions to address knowledge gaps about organisation. Responses were independently coded, collapsed and synthesised. Round 2 (Delphi round 1) invited panellists to rate importance of each question. In round 3 (Delphi round 2), panellists ranked questions into final order of importance. Literature review conducted on 36 questions and gap map generated.

Results: Diverse range of practitioners and academics in LMICs from all global regions generated 744 questions for PHC organisation. In round 2, 36 synthesised questions on organisation were rated. In round 3, the top 16 questions were ranked to yield four prioritised questions in each area. Literature reviews confirmed gap in evidence on prioritised questions in LMICs.

Conclusion: In line with the 2018 Astana Declaration, this mixed-methods study has produced a unique list of essential gaps in our knowledge of how best to organise PHC, priority-ordered by LMIC expert informants capable of shaping their mitigation. Research teams in LMIC have developed implementation plans to answer the top four ranked research questions.

Keywords: delphi; developing countries; financing healthcare: low and middle income countries; knowledge; models of care; primary health care; research gaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for search on primary healthcare organisation in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of studies from each low-income and middle-income country (LMIC).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Static version of gap map of studies for model of care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Conference on Primary Health Care Declaration of Alma-Ata. Alma-Ata: USSR: WHO, 1978.
    1. Labonté R, Pooyak S, Baum F, et al. . Implementation, effectiveness and political context of comprehensive primary health care: preliminary findings of a global literature review. Aust J Prim Health 2008;14:58–67. 10.1071/PY08037 - DOI
    1. Tarimo E, Webster E, World Health Organization . Primary health care concepts and challenges in a changing world: Alma-Ata revisited. Geneva: WHO, 1994.
    1. World Health Assembly Primary health care, including health system strengthening WHA6212. Geneva: 22nd World Health Assembly, WHO, 2009: 3.
    1. Starfield B. Measuring the attainment of primary care. J Med Educ 1979;54:361–9. 10.1097/00001888-197905000-00001 - DOI - PubMed