Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 29;7(8):2325967119866732.
doi: 10.1177/2325967119866732. eCollection 2019 Aug.

A Definition of Significant Instability and a Scoring System for Predicting Meniscal Tears in ACL-Deficient Knees

Amit Joshi  1   2 , Nagmani Singh  2 , Ishor Pradhan  2 , Bibek Basukala  3 , Ashok Kumar Banskota  2
Affiliations

A Definition of Significant Instability and a Scoring System for Predicting Meniscal Tears in ACL-Deficient Knees

Amit Joshi et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees risk recurrent instability of the affected knee, which may predispose to meniscal injuries. Various studies have correlated the incidence of meniscal tear with elapsed time from ACL tear and number of instability events. However, it is not clear how significant an instability event needs to be to contribute to a meniscal tear.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to (1) define a significant instability episode and (2) develop a checklist and scoring system for predicting meniscal tears based on significant instability episode. We hypothesized that patients with ACL-deficient knees who met the scoring threshold for a significant instability episode would have a higher incidence of meniscal tears compared with those who did not meet the threshold.

Study design: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-confirmed isolated ACL tear for longer than 3 months. We determined parameters for assessing instability episodes and defined any instability events between the MRI and ACL reconstruction as significant or insignificant. Patients were then grouped into a significant instability group (≥1 significant episode) and an insignificant instability group, and the incidence and types of meniscal tears found during surgery were compared between groups.

Results: There were 108 study patients: 62 in the significant instability group and 46 in the insignificant instability group. During surgery, 58 meniscal tears (46 medial, 12 lateral) were recorded, for an overall meniscal injury rate of 53.70%. In the significant instability group, 47 patients (75.81%) had a meniscal tear and 15 (24.19%) had intact menisci (P < .001). In the insignificant instability group, 11 patients (23.91%) had a meniscal tear and 35 (76.08%) had intact menisci (P < .001). Regarding the 58 patients with a meniscal tear, 47 (81.03%) had ≥1 significant episode of instability before surgery, as compared with 11 (18.97%) who had insignificant or no instability. The odds of having a medial meniscal tear at ACL reconstruction was 10 times higher in the significant instability group versus the insignificant instability group.

Conclusion: The incidence of a medial meniscal tear was 10 times greater in patients with a significant episode of instability versus those with insignificant instability, as defined using a predictive scoring system. The incidence of lateral meniscal tear did not change with instability episodes.

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament deficiency; instability; meniscal tear; predictive scoring system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient selection flowchart. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Meniscal tear patterns in the study participants.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anstey DE, Heyworth BE, Price MD, Gill TJ. Effect of timing of ACL reconstruction in surgery and development of meniscal and chondral lesions. Phys Sportsmed. 2012;40(1):36–40. - PubMed
    1. Astur DC, Cachoeira CM, da Silva Vieira T, Debieux P, Kaleka CC, Cohen M. Increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery in paediatric verses adult population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(5):1362–1366. - PubMed
    1. Brambilla L, Pulici L, Carimati G, et al. Prevalence of associated lesions in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation with surgical timing and with patient age, sex, and body mass index. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(12):2966–2973. - PubMed
    1. Budny J, Fox J, Rauh M, Fineberg M. Emerging trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(1):63–69. - PubMed
    1. Chhadia AM, Inacio MC, Maletis GB, Csintalan RP, Davis BR, Funahashi TT. Are meniscus and cartilage injuries related to time to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(9):1894–1899. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources