Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 16;4(9):14004-14012.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b01702. eCollection 2019 Aug 27.

Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Extruded Commercial Cat Food

Affiliations

Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Extruded Commercial Cat Food

Monica Grandi et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

The occurrence of the most important mycotoxins (deoxynivalenol, fumonisin B1 and B2, aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, and G2, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, T-2, and HT-2 toxins) was determined in 64 extruded cat foods purchased in Italy through ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Deoxynivalenol and fumonisins were the most common contaminants (quantified in 80 and 95% of the samples, respectively). Conversely, aflatoxins B2, G1, and G2 were not identified in any sample. Some cat foods exceeded the regulatory limit for aflatoxin B1 (n = 3) or the guidance values for zearalenone (n = 3), fumonisins (n = 2), ochratoxin A (n = 1), and T-2 (n = 1) recently established for pets in the European Union. A widespread co-occurrence of mycotoxins was observed (28, 42, and 8% of the samples contained quantifiable amounts of two, three, and four mycotoxins, respectively). This study describes criticisms regarding the mycotoxin issue in pet food and suggests an improvement of the monitoring of the pet food chain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Samples of commercial dry cat food that did not comply with the current EU legislation concerning mycotoxin contamination.

References

    1. White G. A.; Ward L.; Pink C.; Craigon J.; Millar K. M. ″Who’s been a good dog?″ - Owner perceptions and motivations for treat giving. Prev. Vet. Med. 2016, 132, 14–19. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.08.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boermans H. J.; Leung M. C. Mycotoxins and the pet food industry: toxicological evidence and risk assessment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 95–102. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sweeney M. J.; Dobson A. D. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 43, 141–58. 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00112-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Twomey L. N.; Pethick D. W.; Rowe J. B.; Choct M.; Pluske J. R.; Brown W.; Laviste M. C. The use of sorghum and corn as alternatives to rice in dog foods. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 1704S–5S. 10.1093/jn/132.6.1704S. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaushik G. Effect of processing on mycotoxin content in grains. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 55, 1672–1683. 10.1080/10408398.2012.701254. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources