Feedback in Couple and Family Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 31497883
- DOI: 10.1111/famp.12485
Feedback in Couple and Family Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) is recommended as a psychotherapy procedure to serve as clinical feedback in order to improve client treatment outcomes. ROM can work as a warning signal to the therapist if the client shows signs of no change or deterioration. This study has investigated whether any difference in outcome could be detected between those clients in couple and family therapy who used the Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change (STIC) feedback system (ROM condition) versus those who were offered treatment without the use of STIC ("treatment as usual" or TAU condition). A sample of 328 adults seeking couple and family therapy in Norway was randomly assigned to ROM versus TAU conditions. Outcome measures were The Outcome Questionnaire-45 and The Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. The results demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes between the ROM and TAU. Possible explanations of this result related to design and implementation issues are discussed.
Keywords: Couple and Family Therapy; Feedback; Randomized Clinical Trial.
© 2019 Family Process Institute.
References
-
- Amble, I., Gude, T., Stubdal, S., Andersen, B. J., & Wampold, B. E. (2014). The effect of implementing the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 feedback system in Norway: A multisite randomized trial in a naturalistic setting. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.928756
-
- Amble, I., Gude, T., Stubdal, S., Oktedalen, T., Skjorten, A. M., Andersen, B. J. et al. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2: The Norwegian version in an international context. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 504-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.849016.
-
- Anderson, H. (2016). Postmodern/poststructural/social construction therapies. In T. L. Sexton & J. Lebow (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy (pp. 182-204). New York: Routledge.
-
- Anderson, S. R., Tambling, R. B., Huff, S. C., Heafner, J., Johnson, L. N., & Ketring, S. A. (2014). The development of a reliable change index and cutoff for the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Therapy, 40, 525-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12095.
-
- Anker, M. G., Duncan, B. L., & Sparks, J. A. (2009). Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 693-704.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
