Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 1;112(1):30-37.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz169.

The IARC Monographs: Updated Procedures for Modern and Transparent Evidence Synthesis in Cancer Hazard Identification

Affiliations

The IARC Monographs: Updated Procedures for Modern and Transparent Evidence Synthesis in Cancer Hazard Identification

Jonathan M Samet et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

The Monographs produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) apply rigorous procedures for the scientific review and evaluation of carcinogenic hazards by independent experts. The Preamble to the IARC Monographs, which outlines these procedures, was updated in 2019, following recommendations of a 2018 expert advisory group. This article presents the key features of the updated Preamble, a major milestone that will enable IARC to take advantage of recent scientific and procedural advances made during the 12 years since the last Preamble amendments. The updated Preamble formalizes important developments already being pioneered in the Monographs program. These developments were taken forward in a clarified and strengthened process for identifying, reviewing, evaluating, and integrating evidence to identify causes of human cancer. The advancements adopted include the strengthening of systematic review methodologies; greater emphasis on mechanistic evidence, based on key characteristics of carcinogens; greater consideration of quality and informativeness in the critical evaluation of epidemiological studies, including their exposure assessment methods; improved harmonization of evaluation criteria for the different evidence streams; and a single-step process of integrating evidence on cancer in humans, cancer in experimental animals, and mechanisms for reaching overall evaluations. In all, the updated Preamble underpins a stronger and more transparent method for the identification of carcinogenic hazards, the essential first step in cancer prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Saracci R, Wild C.. International Agency for Research on Cancer: the first 50 years, 1965–2015. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2015.
    1. IARC. Preamble to the IARC Monographs, amended January 2019. https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Preamble-2019.pdf. Accessed September 4, 2019.
    1. Guyton KZ, Kyle AD, Aubrecht J, et al. Improving prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by considering multiple mechanisms and applying toxicogenomic approaches. Mutat Res. 2009;681(2–3):230–240. - PubMed
    1. Cote I, Andersen ME, Ankley GT, et al. The next generation of risk assessment multi-year study-highlights of findings, applications to risk assessment, and future directions. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124(11):1671–1682. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corvi R, Madia F, Guyton KZ, et al. Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop. Toxicol In Vitro. 2017;45(pt 3):278–286. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types