Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):1246.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7460-3.

Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS)

Madeleine Steinmetz-Wood  1 , Kabisha Velauthapillai  2 , Grace O'Brien  2 , Nancy A Ross  3
Affiliations

Assessing the micro-scale environment using Google Street View: the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS)

Madeleine Steinmetz-Wood et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Altering micro-scale features of neighborhood walkability (e.g., benches, sidewalks, and cues of social disorganization or crime) could be a relatively cost-effective method of creating environments that are conducive to active living. Traditionally, measuring the micro-scale environment has required researchers to perform observational audits. Technological advances have led to the development of virtual audits as alternatives to observational field audits with the enviable properties of cost-efficiency from elimination of travel time and increased safety for auditors. This study examined the reliability of the Virtual Systematic Tool for Evaluating Pedestrian Streetscapes (Virtual-STEPS), a Google Street View-based auditing tool specifically designed to remotely assess micro-scale characteristics of the built environment.

Methods: We created Virtual-STEPS, a tool with 40 items categorized into 6 domains (pedestrian infrastructure, traffic calming and streets, building characteristics, bicycling infrastructure, transit, and aesthetics). Items were selected based on their past abilities to predict active living and on their feasibility for a virtual auditing tool. Two raters performed virtual and field audits of street segments in Montreal neighborhoods stratified by the Walkscore that was used to determine the 'walking-friendliness' of a neighborhood. The reliability between virtual and field audits (n = 40), as well as inter-rater reliability (n = 60) were assessed using percent agreement, Cohen's Kappa statistic, and the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient.

Results: Virtual audits and field audits (excluding travel time) took similar amounts of time to perform (9.8 versus 8.2 min). Percentage agreement between virtual and field audits, and for inter-rater agreement was 80% or more for the majority of items included in the Virtual-STEPS tool. There was high reliability between virtual and field audits with Kappa and ICC statistics indicating that 20 out of 40 (50.0%) items had almost perfect agreement and 13 (32.5%) items had substantial agreement. Inter-rater reliability was also high with 17 items (42.5%) with almost perfect agreement and 11 (27.5%) items with substantial agreement.

Conclusions: Virtual-STEPS is a reliable tool. Tools that measure the micro-scale environment are important because changing this environment could be a relatively cost-effective method of creating environments that are conducive to active living.

Keywords: Active living; Audit; Built environment; Google Street View; Micro-scale; Pedestrian; Physical activity; Virtual; Walkability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Randomly selected streets and randomly selected audit start points within a forward sortation area
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Examples of ratings for Virtual-STEPS items. Image captures from Google Street View (www.google.com/maps)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;387(10034):2207–2217. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Creatore MI, Glazier RH, Moineddin R, Fazli GS, Johns A, Gozdyra P, et al. Association of neighborhood walkability with change in overweight, obesity, and diabetes. Jama. 2016;315(20):2211–20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5898. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wasfi Rania A., Dasgupta Kaberi, Orpana Heather, Ross Nancy A. Neighborhood Walkability and Body Mass Index Trajectories: Longitudinal Study of Canadians. American Journal of Public Health. 2016;106(5):934–940. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303096. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrington-Leigh C, Millard-Ball A. A century of sprawl in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(27):8244–8249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504033112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cain KL, Millstein RA, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Gavand KA, Frank LD, et al. Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the microscale audit of pedestrian streetscapes (MAPS) Soc Sci Med. 2014;116:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources