Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;50(6):634-643.
doi: 10.1111/age.12853. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

Accuracies of genomic prediction for twenty economically important traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle

Affiliations

Accuracies of genomic prediction for twenty economically important traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle

B Zhu et al. Anim Genet. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Genomic prediction has been widely utilized to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBVs) in farm animals. In this study, we conducted genomic prediction for 20 economically important traits including growth, carcass and meat quality traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle. Five approaches (GBLUP, BayesA, BayesB, BayesCπ and BayesR) were used to estimate the genomic breeding values. The predictive accuracies ranged from 0.159 (lean meat percentage estimated by BayesCπ) to 0.518 (striploin weight estimated by BayesR). Moreover, we found that the average predictive accuracies across 20 traits were 0.361, 0.361, 0.367, 0.367 and 0.378, and the averaged regression coefficients were 0.89, 0.86, 0.89, 0.94 and 0.95 for GBLUP, BayesA, BayesB, BayesCπ and BayesR respectively. The genomic prediction accuracies were mostly moderate and high for growth and carcass traits, whereas meat quality traits showed relatively low accuracies. We concluded that Bayesian regression approaches, especially for BayesR and BayesCπ, were slightly superior to GBLUP for most traits. Increasing with the sizes of reference population, these two approaches are feasible for future application of genomic selection in Chinese beef cattle.

Keywords: Bayesian methods; accuracy; cross-validation; economic traits; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Regression of predictive ability on heritability for 20 traits using five statistics methods.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akanno E.C., Plastow G., Woodward B.W. et al (2014) Reliability of molecular breeding values for Warner‐Bratzler shear force and carcass traits of beef cattle – an independent validation study. Journal of Animal Science 92, 2896–904. - PubMed
    1. Bolormaa S., Pryce J.E., Kemper K. et al (2013) Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3088–104. - PubMed
    1. Browning S.R. & Browning B.L. (2007) Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing‐data inference for whole‐genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 1084–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen L., Vinsky M. & Li C. (2015) Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle. Animal Genetics 46, 55–9. - PubMed
    1. Clark S.A., Hickey J.M. & van der Werf J.H. (2011) Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 18. - PMC - PubMed