Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;41(12):4181-4188.
doi: 10.1002/hed.25948. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

Determination of legal responsibility in shared airway management between anesthesiology and otolaryngology

Affiliations

Determination of legal responsibility in shared airway management between anesthesiology and otolaryngology

Henry C Ideker et al. Head Neck. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Malpractice litigation remains an important point of contention in the United States. Airway management often sees multidisciplinary teams of anesthesiologists and otolaryngologists. This report analyzes lawsuits affecting both teams in airway management.

Methods: The Westlaw legal database (West Publishing Co., St. Paul, MN) was used to search for malpractice cases involving failed airway management, where both anesthesiology and otolaryngology were involved.

Results: Among the 28 cases analyzed, otolaryngology and anesthesiology were most commonly sued together (46.4%). When sued together, defendants were less likely to win and average award amounts ($4, 558 716) were higher. These cases most commonly occurred in the operating room (78.6%), involved a difficult/improper intubation (39.3%), alleged a failure to follow standard of care (57%), and resulted in death (60.7%).

Conclusion: These cases primarily cited failure to follow standard of care and communication failures. Efforts should be directed toward multidisciplinary airway management protocols and effective communication.

Keywords: airway; anesthesiology; malpractice; multidisciplinary team; otolaryngology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Burkle CM. Medical malpractice: can we rescue a decaying system? Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(4):326-332.
    1. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, et al. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(19):2024-2033.
    1. Stamm JA, Korzick KA, Beech K, Wood KE. Medical malpractice: reform for today's patients and clinicians. Am J Med. 2016;129(1):20-25.
    1. Mastroianni AC, Mello MM, Sommer S, Hardy M, Gallagher TH. The flaws in state ‘apology’ and ‘disclosure’ laws dilute their intended impact on malpractice suits. Health Aff. 2010;29(9):1611-1619.
    1. Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A. Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(7):629-636.

MeSH terms