Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;92(2):129-138.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.25593. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

Why are vaccines against many human viral diseases still unavailable; an historic perspective?

Affiliations
Review

Why are vaccines against many human viral diseases still unavailable; an historic perspective?

Gregory A Tannock et al. J Med Virol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The number of new and improved human viral vaccines licensed in recent years contrasts sharply with what could be termed the golden era (1955-1990) when vaccines against polio-, measles, mumps, rubella, and hepatitis B viruses first became available. Here, we attempt to explain why vaccines, mainly against viruses other than human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus, are still unavailable. They include human herpesviruses other than varicella-zoster virus, respiratory syncytial and most other respiratory, enteric and arthropod-borne viruses. Improved oral poliovirus vaccines are also urgently required. Their unavailability is attributable to regulatory/economic factors and the properties of individual viruses, but also to an absence of relevant animal models and ethical problems for the conduct of clinical of trials in pediatric and other critical populations. All are portents of likely difficulties for the licensing of effective vaccines against emerging pathogens, such as avian influenza, Ebola, and Zika viruses.

Keywords: human; immunity; vaccine development; veterinary; viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tannock G. What hope for recombinant vaccines? Today's life science. Natl Libr Aust Collect. 1991;3:12‐15.
    1. GlaxoSmithKline Vaccine HPV‐007 Study Group , Romanowski B, de Borba PC, Naud PS, Roteli‐Martins CM, De Carvalho NS, et al. Sustained efficacy and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus (HPV)‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine: analysis of a randomised placebo‐controlled trial up to 6.4 years. Lancet. 2009;374:1975‐1985. - PubMed
    1. Cox MM, Patriarca PA, Treanor J. FluBlok, a recombinant hemagglutinin influenza vaccine. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2008;2:211‐219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackwood MW, Hickle L, Kapil S, Silva R. Vaccine development using recombinant DNA technology. Counc Agric Sci Technol. 2008:38.
    1. Horimoto T, Kawaoka Y. Strategies for developing vaccines against H5N1 influenza A viruses. Trends Mol Med. 2006;12:506‐514. - PubMed

MeSH terms