Practical Heart Sparing Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Resource-Limited Radiation Oncology Clinics
- PMID: 31503062
- DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000597
Practical Heart Sparing Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Resource-Limited Radiation Oncology Clinics
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report experiences of practical heart sparing breast radiation therapy (RT) using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in resource-limited radiation oncology clinics.
Patients and methods: Twelve patients underwent computed tomography-simulations with both free-breathing (FB) and CPAP under the individual maximum tolerable air pressure. For each patient, left-sided breast RT plans (9 with breast only, 3 with breast and regional nodal stations) with FB and CPAP were created using 3-dimensional conformal RT (supine tangential or wide tangential RT fields) according to RTOG 1304. For daily RT, patients started CPAP in the patients waiting area for 15 minutes before entering the treatment room and continued CPAP during RT. Treatment setup times between breast RT with and without CPAP were compared.
Results: All patients tolerated CPAP well with 8 to 15 cm H2O of air pressure. Compared with FB, CPAP inflated the thorax and increased total lung volume by 35±16% (CPAP: 3136±751 vs. FB: 2354±657 cm, P<0.01); caudally displaced the heart by 1.8 cm (P<0.01); and decreased heart volume within tangential RT fields on computed tomography-simulation scans by 96±4% (1.4±2.5 vs. 21±17 cm, P=0.02) in all patients. Planning target volume coverage was acceptable in all RT plans. CPAP lowered mean dose (Dmean) to heart by 47±22% (2.5±1.5 vs. 5.4±3.3 Gy, P<0.01); heart volume receiving ≥25 Gy (V25) by 82±18% (2.2±2.6 vs. 9.1±7.1%, P<0.01); Dmean to left anterior descending coronary artery by 68±8% (4.7±1.9 vs. 14.8±3.3 Gy, P<0.01). CPAP decreased radiation dose to ipsilateral lung compared with FB: 9.1±5.8 versus 11.2±8 Gy (20% reduction, P=0.03) of Dmean; 15.7±12.5 vs. 20.5±17.5% (25% reduction, P=0.03) of V20. RT with CPAP did not increase treatment setup time compared with FB (week 1: 362±63 vs. 352±77 s; week 2 to 5: 217±13 vs. 201±14 s, all P>0.25).
Conclusion: Novel use of CPAP allowed efficient and practical heart sparing breast RT without increasing infrastructural requirements in resource-limited radiation oncology clinics.
Similar articles
-
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure-Assisted Breathing With Supine Tangential Left Breast Radiation Therapy When Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Was Ineffective or Unsuitable: Clinical Implications for an Affordable Heart-Sparing Breast Radiation Therapy to Reduce the Health Care Disparities in Low-Resource Settings.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 15;9(6):101472. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101472. eCollection 2024 Jun. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38681888 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous positive airway pressure with deep inspiration breath hold in left-sided breast radiation therapy.Med Dosim. 2021 Summer;46(2):127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Med Dosim. 2021. PMID: 33020023
-
Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy with and without breath-hold: does IMRT reduce the cardiac dose even further?Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Sep 14. Radiother Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24044804
-
Comparison of Nodal Target Volume Definition in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy According to RTOG Versus ESTRO Atlases: A Practical Review From the TransAtlantic Radiation Oncology Network (TRONE).Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jul 1;107(3):437-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 22. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020. PMID: 32334035 Review.
-
Integrating Mathematical Modeling into the Roadmap for Personalized Adaptive Radiation Therapy.Trends Cancer. 2019 Aug;5(8):467-474. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Trends Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31421904 Review.
Cited by
-
Optimizing target and diaphragmatic configuration, and dosimetric benefits using continuous positive airway pressure in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung tumors.Radiat Oncol J. 2024 Sep;42(3):200-209. doi: 10.3857/roj.2024.00101. Epub 2024 Sep 20. Radiat Oncol J. 2024. PMID: 39354823 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Optimal Pressure of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;14(17):4308. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174308. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36077844 Free PMC article.
-
Application of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Thoracic Respiratory Motion Management: An Assessment in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy Environment.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jan 4;7(3):100889. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100889. eCollection 2022 May-Jun. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35198838 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure-Assisted Breathing With Supine Tangential Left Breast Radiation Therapy When Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy Was Ineffective or Unsuitable: Clinical Implications for an Affordable Heart-Sparing Breast Radiation Therapy to Reduce the Health Care Disparities in Low-Resource Settings.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 15;9(6):101472. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101472. eCollection 2024 Jun. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38681888 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical