Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Sep;29(5):424-430.
doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000667.

Comparison between the Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint for the early treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison between the Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint for the early treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip

Lin Ran et al. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

The Pavlik harness and the Tübingen hip flexion splint (Tübingen hip flexion splint) are two effective options for the early management of patients younger than 6 months of age with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients younger than 6 months of age with type IIb to IV DDH managed by Pavlik harness or Tübingen hip flexion splint. The Pavlik harness and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups were comparable regarding the affected side (P = 0.09), Graf grade (P = 0.635), and age at initial treatment (P = 0.77). Overall, failure rates were 12 and 33% in Pavlik harness (4/33 hips) and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups (14/43 hips), respectively (P = 0.038). No cases of avascular necrosis (AVN) were found in either group. In the Tübingen hip flexion splint group, the failure rate was significantly higher in bilateral cases (66.6%; P = 0.004), in severe forms (Graf grade IV hips; P ≤ 0.0001), and in patients with lower age at initial treatment (67.7 ± 39.3 days; P = 0.005). The average follow-up time was 30.35 ± 3.58 months (range: 24-36). At the last follow-up visit, no statistically significant differences were found between the Pavlik harness and Tübingen hip flexion splint groups regarding the acetabular index (t = 0.632; P = 0.53) or center-edge angle (Z = -0.303; P = 0.762). Our study showed that both the brace treatments for DDH in children younger than 6 months of age were effective and well tolerated. However, Tübingen hip flexion splint should not be used in patients with severe forms of DDH (Graf grade IV hips).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pavone V, Testa G, Riccioli M, Evola FR, Avondo S, Sessa G. Treatment of developmental dysplasia of hip with Tubingen hip flexion splint. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015; 35:485–489
    1. Weinstein SL. Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 225:62–76
    1. White KK, Sucato DJ, Agrawal S, Browne R. Ultrasonographic findings in hips with a positive ortolani sign and their relationship to Pavlik harness failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:113–120
    1. Lerman JA, Emans JB, Millis MB, Share J, Zurakowski D, Kasser JR. Early failure of Pavlik harness treatment for developmental hip dysplasia: clinical and ultrasound predictors. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001; 21:348–353
    1. Viere RG, Birch JG, Herring JA, Roach JW, Johnston CE. Use of the Pavlik harness in congenital dislocation of the hip. An analysis of failures of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72:238–244

Publication types