Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Oct;21(10):1463-1470.
doi: 10.1111/jch.13674. Epub 2019 Sep 10.

A texting-based blood pressure surveillance intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A texting-based blood pressure surveillance intervention

Roula S Zahr et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Oct.

Abstract

The authors examined whether using home BP measurements collected via a custom-built bi-directional-texting platform incorporated into patients' electronic medical records would lead to treatment calibration and improved BP management. Patients were randomized to either the intervention group and collected home measurements based on reminders and reported via bi-directional texting, or to the control group, with home BP measurement reporting via standard practice (eg, phone, electronic medical record portal) and instructed to return 7 morning and 7 evening BP measurements. Outcomes included number of BP measurements submitted, the number of medication changes, reduction in BP, and BP control. 72% of the intervention group submitted at least 14 readings, compared with 45% of the control group. BP control improved in both groups. However, the authors found no statistically significant difference in BP or the number of BP-medication changes at 1, 3, or 6 months compared with the control group.

Keywords: SMS; blood pressure measurement; home measurement; hypertension; monitoring; surveillance; texting; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors report no conflicts.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
BP for the intervention and control groups over time. Dots are means, and the bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Notice that BP was reduced for both groups during the study period, but there was no difference between the groups

Comment in

References

    1. Kerr EA, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Klamerus ML, Subramanian U, Hogan MM, Hofer TP. The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(10):717‐727. - PubMed
    1. Mallick S, Kanthety R, Rahman M. Home blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice: a review. Am J Med. 2009;122(9):803‐810. - PubMed
    1. Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population‐based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens. 1998;16(7):971‐975. - PubMed
    1. Asayama K, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, et al. Use of 2003 European Society of Hypertension‐European Society of Cardiology guidelines for predicting stroke using self‐measured blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(19):2026‐2031. - PubMed
    1. Bobrie G, Genès N, Vaur L, et al. Is "isolated home" hypertension as opposed to "isolated office" hypertension a sign of greater cardiovascular risk? Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(18):2205‐2211. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances