Intra-arterial catheter-directed CT angiography for assessment of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
- PMID: 31504047
- PMCID: PMC6736289
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221375
Intra-arterial catheter-directed CT angiography for assessment of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety as well as associated image quality of catheter-directed CT angiography (CCTA) with a low dose of iodine contrast agent compared to intravenous CTA in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).
Methods: Retrospective data analysis of 92 patients undergoing EVAR between January 2009 and December 2017 was performed. Patients were divided in two groups; those receiving CTA (n = 59) after intravenous contrast agent application and those receiving CCTA (n = 33) via an intraarterial catheter placed in the descending aorta. Demographic and cardiovascular risk factors as well as renal function parameters before, immediately after and 6-60 months after EVAR were evaluated. As primary endpoint, changes in serum creatinine levels in the two groups were evaluated. Secondary endpoints encompassed complications associated with intraarterial catheter placement. Objective (signal-to-noise ratios) and subjective image quality (5-point Likert scale) were compared.
Results: Amount of contrast medium was significantly lower in CCTA compared to i.v. CTA (23 ± 7 ml vs. 119 ± 15 ml, p<0.0001). Patients undergoing catheter-directed CTA had higher baseline creatinine values compared to the group with intravenous iodine application (1.9 ± 0.6 mg/dl vs. 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dl; p<0.0001). Follow-up serum creatinine levels however did not show significant alterations between the two groups (1.9 ± 0.4 mg/dl vs. 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/dl). No major complications were detected in the CCTA group. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was comparable between i.v. CTA and CCTA (8.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.0; p = 0.37) and subjective image similarly revealed no differences with a good interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.647).
Conclusions: Catheter-directed CTA is safe and provides comparable image quality with a substantial retrenchment of the needed amount of iodine-based contrast medium. However, no benefit of the reduced contrast medium protocol with respect to renal function was observed.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Low Contrast Dose Catheter-Directed CT Angiography (CCTA).Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Apr;39(4):606-10. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1232-y. Epub 2015 Oct 30. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26514834
-
Ultralow Iodine Dose Transarterial Catheter-Directed CT Angiography for Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair Planning.Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;35:234-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.01.045. Epub 2016 May 27. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016. PMID: 27238979
-
CT angiography with 15 mL contrast material injection on time-resolved imaging for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108861. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108861. Epub 2020 Feb 19. Eur J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32179423
-
Computerized tomography angiography by direct intra-aortic low volume contrast injection in patients being evaluated for EVAR.Vascular. 2017 Oct;25(5):451-458. doi: 10.1177/1708538117690662. Epub 2017 Jan 24. Vascular. 2017. PMID: 28118783
-
Is contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) superior to computed tomography angiography (CTA) in detection of endoleaks in post-EVAR patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Ultrasound. 2019 Mar;22(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s40477-019-00364-7. Epub 2019 Feb 15. J Ultrasound. 2019. PMID: 30771104 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cardiovascular Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease: Beyond Lumen Assessment.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jan 12;11(1):22. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010022. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38248892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of ultra-low contrast dose CT aortography for the management of aortic aneurysmal disease.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 3;19(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03099-7. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39358757 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Kim LG, Marteau TM, Scott RAP, Thompson SG, Walker NM (2002) The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360(9345):1531–1539 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11522-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gianfagna F, Veronesi G, Bertù L, Tozzi M, Tarallo A, Ferrario MM, Castelli P (2016) Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation with cardiovascular risk stratification: protocol of the Risk of Cardiovascular diseases and abdominal aortic Aneurysm in Varese (RoCAV) population based study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 16(1):243 10.1186/s12872-016-0420-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kniemeyer HW, Kessler T, Reber PU, Ris HB, Hakki H, Widmer MK (2000) Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, a permanent challenge or a waste of resources? Prediction of outcome using a multi-organ-dysfunction score. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 19(2):190–196. 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0980 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials