Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 9;8(9):337.
doi: 10.3390/plants8090337.

Herbicide Resistance Traits in Maize and Soybean: Current Status and Future Outlook

Affiliations
Review

Herbicide Resistance Traits in Maize and Soybean: Current Status and Future Outlook

Vijay K Nandula. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

This article reviews, focusing on maize and soybean, previous efforts to develop nontransgenic herbicide-resistant crops (HRCs), currently available transgenic HRC traits and technologies, as well as future chemical weed management options over the horizon. Since the mid twentieth century, herbicides rapidly replaced all other means of weed management. Overreliance on 'herbicide-only' weed control strategies hastened evolution of HR weed species. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop technology revolutionized weed management in agronomic crops, but GR weeds, led by Palmer amaranth, severely reduced returns from various cropping systems and affected the bottom line of growers across the world. An additional problem was the lack of commercialization of a new herbicide mode of action since the 1990s. Auxinic HRCs offer a short-term alternative for management of GR Palmer amaranth and other weed species. New HRCs stacked with multiple herbicide resistance traits and at least two new herbicide modes of action expected to be available in the mid-2020s provide new chemical options for weed management in row crops in the next decade.

Keywords: corn; herbicide resistance trait; maize; soybean.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Official dicamba-related injury investigations as reported by state departments of agriculture (A) and estimates of dicamba-injured soybean acreage as reported by state extension weed scientists (B) in the 2017 growing season in the US.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crop Loss. [(accessed on 9 August 2019)]; Available online: http://wssa.net/wssa/weed/croploss-2/
    1. Timmons F.L. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 2005;53:748–761. doi: 10.1614/0043-1745(2005)053[0748:AHOWCI]2.0.CO;2. - DOI
    1. Marrone P.G. Pesticidal natural products—Status and future potential. Pest Manag. Sci. 2019 doi: 10.1002/ps.5433. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duke S.O. Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Manag. Sci. 2005;61:211–218. doi: 10.1002/ps.1024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Green J.M., Castle L.A. Transitioning from single to multiple herbicide-resistant crops. In: Nandula V.K., editor. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2010. pp. 67–92.

LinkOut - more resources