Predictors of Appropriate Antibiotic Use in Bacteremia Patients Presenting at the Emergency Department
- PMID: 31505779
- PMCID: PMC6783907
- DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8030142
Predictors of Appropriate Antibiotic Use in Bacteremia Patients Presenting at the Emergency Department
Abstract
Sepsis is a condition that requires appropriate antibiotic treatment at the emergency department (ED). Most previous studies conducted on inappropriate antibiotic use at the ED were conducted in developed countries with a low percentage of sepsis. This study aimed to find additional clinical predictors for appropriate antibiotic use in bacteremia patients presenting at the ED from a developing country, in which there is a higher proportion of patients with sepsis. We included adult patients who presented at the ED with clinical suspicion of infection and bacteremia. Patients allocated to the appropriate antibiotic group were those in whom the prescribed antibiotic was sensitive to the pathogen. Predictors and outcomes of appropriate antibiotic use were analyzed. A total of 3133 patients who met the study criteria presented at the ED during the study period. Of those, 271 patients were diagnosed with bacteremia, 48 of whom (17.71%) received inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions. Only pulse rate was an independent factor for appropriate antibiotic treatment, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.019 (95% CI of 1.001, 1.036). In terms of clinical outcomes, the inappropriate antibiotic group had higher proportions of 28-day mortality (29.17% vs. 25.25%; p-value = 0.022) and longer hospitalization (14 vs. 9 days; p-value = 0.003). This study found that inappropriate antibiotics were prescribed in 17% of bacteremia patients presenting at the ED and that high pulse rate was an indicator for appropriate antibiotic prescription. Patients with inappropriate antibiotic administration had longer hospitalization and higher 28-day mortality than those who received appropriate antibiotic treatment.
Keywords: community-acquired infection; hospitalization; mortality; predictors; pulse rate; sepsis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Clinical impact of Gram-negative nonfermenters on adults with community-onset bacteremia in the emergency department.J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015 Feb;48(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 21. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015. PMID: 24060496
-
Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in the Emergency Department.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Feb 1;74(2):515-520. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky447. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019. PMID: 30445465 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors and outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia among adults visiting the ED.Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;30(6):852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.029. Epub 2011 Aug 19. Am J Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 21855263
-
Differential impacts of inappropriate empirical therapy on ED patients with Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci bacteremia.Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):940-946. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158359. Epub 2019 Jul 23. Am J Emerg Med. 2020. PMID: 31493980
-
Different impact of the appropriateness of empirical antibiotics for bacteremia among younger adults and the elderly in the ED.Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;31(2):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Sep 20. Am J Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23000336
Cited by
-
Clinical Predictors of Escherichia coli Versus Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia at the Emergency Department.Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;14(7):654. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14070654. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40723957 Free PMC article.
-
The Diagnostic Values of Peptidoglycan, Lipopolysaccharide, and (1,3)-Beta-D-Glucan in Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infection: A Single Center, Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;12(6):1461. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061461. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35741271 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singer M., Deutschman C.S., Seymour C.W., Shankar-Hari M., Annane D., Bauer M., Bellomo R., Bernard G.R., Chiche J.D., Coopersmith C.M., et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nguyen H.B., Rivers E.P., Abrahamian F.M., Moran G.J., Abraham E., Trzeciak S., Huang D.T., Osborn T., Stevens D., Talan D.A., et al. Severe sepsis and septic Shock: Review of the literature and emergency department management guidelines. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2006;48:28–54. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.02.015. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rhodes A., Evans L.E., Alhazzani W., Levy M.M., Antonelli M., Ferrer R., Kumar A., Sevransky J.E., Sprung C.L., Nunnally M.E., et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:304–377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous