Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography
- PMID: 31505974
- DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1666818
Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relevance of the angle of progression (AOP) and head-perineum distance (HPD) for predicting the type of delivery and duration of the second stage of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
Methods: In total, 221 women in labor with a single gestational sac at ≥37 weeks of gestation and fetuses in cephalic presentation underwent two-dimensional ultrasonography by transperineal route for measurements of AOP and HPD. Correlations between the type of delivery (vaginal or surgical (cesarean section and forceps)), duration of the second stage of labor, and fetal and maternal characteristics were assessed. AOP and HPD variables were separately studied in the first and second stages of labor. Multivariate logistic regression was followed in stages to identify the predictors for the surgical delivery outcome - stepwise forward method.
Results: In total, 153 (69.2%) women underwent vaginal deliveries, 7 (3.2%) underwent forceps deliveries, and 61 (27.6%) underwent cesarean deliveries. AOP was a statistically significant parameter in first and second stages of labor (107.8 ± 12.1° versus 100.8 ± 13.7°; p = .017), with an inverse correlation with the occurrence of vaginal delivery. HPD was a statistically significant parameter in the second stage of labor (3.42 ± 0.84 cm versus 4.17 ± 0.54 cm; p < .003), with a direct correlation with the occurrence of surgical delivery. The value of AOP that optimized the curve was 129.9° with 85% specificity and 63% sensitivity for the vaginal delivery endpoint. The value of HPD that optimized the curve was 4.3 cm with 69% specificity and 89% sensitivity for the surgical delivery endpoint. In the first phase, the variables defining the type of delivery were the following: height, body mass index, and AOP. In the second phase, the variables defining were the following: height, labor analgesia, HPD, and position of the fetal occiput.
Conclusion: AOP and HPD determined by intrapartum ultrasonography were associated with duration of labor, which may aid in predicting the type of delivery in association with clinical parameters.
Keywords: Cesarean section; labor; prediction; ultrasonography; vaginal delivery.
Similar articles
-
Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):195-201. doi: 10.1002/uog.13210. Epub 2013 Dec 22. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24105705
-
Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):335.e1-335.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31153931
-
The predictive role of serial transperineal sonography during the first stage of labor for cesarean section.J Perinat Med. 2024 Dec 2;53(2):132-139. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2024-0450. Print 2025 Feb 25. J Perinat Med. 2024. PMID: 40079383
-
2D-transperineal ultrasound in delivery room: Contribution in assessing labor progress, predicting outcome of labor and recognizing obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). A systematic review.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025 Mar;54(3):102910. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102910. Epub 2025 Jan 13. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2025. PMID: 39814335
-
Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6S):100439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100439. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021. PMID: 34216834 Review.
Cited by
-
Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 4;3(3):CD010088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35244935 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Jan;67(1):1-16. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23141. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38029738 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of non-invasive methods for assessing the progress of labor in the first stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04938-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35915400 Free PMC article.
-
Prolonged Dystocic Labor in Neuraxial Analgesia and the Role of Enkephalin Neurotransmitters: An Experimental Study.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;24(4):3767. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043767. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36835178 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical