Tapeworm manipulation of copepod behaviour: parasite genotype has a larger effect than host genotype
- PMID: 31506036
- PMCID: PMC6769145
- DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0495
Tapeworm manipulation of copepod behaviour: parasite genotype has a larger effect than host genotype
Abstract
Compared with uninfected individuals, infected animals can exhibit altered phenotypes. The changes often appear beneficial to parasites, leading to the notion that modified host phenotypes are extended parasite phenotypes, shaped by parasite genes. However, the phenotype of a parasitized individual may reflect parasitic manipulation, host responses to infection or both, and disentangling the contribution of parasite genes versus host genes to these altered phenotypes is challenging. Using a tapeworm (Schistocephalus solidus) infecting its copepod first intermediate host, I performed a full-factorial, cross-infection experiment with five host and five parasite genotypes. I found that a behavioural trait modified by infection, copepod activity, was affected by both host and parasite genotype. There was no clear evidence for host genotype by parasite genotype interactions. Several observations indicated that host behaviour was chiefly determined by parasite genes: (i) all infected copepods, regardless of host or parasite genotype, exhibited behavioural changes, (ii) parasitism reduced the differences among copepod genotypes, and (iii) within infected copepods, parasite genotype had twice as large an effect on behaviour as host genotype. I conclude that the altered behaviour of infected copepods primarily represents an extended parasite phenotype, and I discuss how genetic variation in parasitic host manipulation could be maintained.
Keywords: cestode; complex life cycle; genotype–genotype interactions; heritability; host manipulation; trophic transmission.
Conflict of interest statement
I declare I have no competing interests.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Altered host behaviour: manipulation or energy depletion in tapeworm-infected copepods?Parasitology. 2002 Aug;125(Pt 2):187-96. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002001932. Parasitology. 2002. PMID: 12211611
-
Differences between populations in host manipulation by the tapeworm Schistocephalus solidus - is there local adaptation?Parasitology. 2018 May;145(6):762-769. doi: 10.1017/S0031182017001792. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Parasitology. 2018. PMID: 29113596
-
When parasites disagree: evidence for parasite-induced sabotage of host manipulation.Evolution. 2015 Mar;69(3):611-20. doi: 10.1111/evo.12612. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Evolution. 2015. PMID: 25643621 Free PMC article.
-
Magnitude and direction of parasite-induced phenotypic alterations: a meta-analysis in acanthocephalans.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Oct;95(5):1233-1251. doi: 10.1111/brv.12606. Epub 2020 Apr 27. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020. PMID: 32342653 Review.
-
Evolutionary strategies and adaptations for survival between mosquito-parasitic microsporidia and their intermediate copepod hosts: a comparative examination of Amblyospora connecticus and Hyalinocysta chapmani (Microsporidia: Amblyosporidae).Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2005 May;52(1-2):23-35. doi: 10.14411/fp.2005.004. Folia Parasitol (Praha). 2005. PMID: 16004361 Review.
Cited by
-
Loss of species and genetic diversity during colonization: Insights from acanthocephalan parasites in northern European seals.Ecol Evol. 2023 Oct 19;13(10):e10608. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10608. eCollection 2023 Oct. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37869427 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dawkins R. 1982. The extended phenotype. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
- Heil M. 2016. Host manipulation by parasites: cases, patterns, and remaining doubts. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4, 80 (10.3389/fevo.2016.00080) - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources