Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):13058.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49087-z.

Concentrations of macronutrients, minerals and heavy metals in home-prepared diets for adult dogs and cats

Affiliations

Concentrations of macronutrients, minerals and heavy metals in home-prepared diets for adult dogs and cats

Vivian Pedrinelli et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Pet owners often don't acknowledge the need for home-prepared diet formulation by a trained professional and may use recipes from sources such as the internet. Macronutrient and mineral composition of home-prepared diets were analyzed and compared to NRC and FEDIAF recommendations, and heavy metal concentrations were analyzed and compared to FDA maximum tolerable levels (MTL) for dogs and cats. Recipes of home-prepared diets for adult dogs (n = 75) and cats (n = 25) were evaluated. Analyses of protein, fat, and fiber were performed according to AOAC, and mineral and heavy metal analyses were performed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). None of the diets supplied recommended levels of all nutrients evaluated, and more than 84.0% of diets presented three or more nutrients below recommendations. Nutrients with most levels below recommendations were calcium and potassium in recipes for dogs and iron and zinc in recipes for cats. As for heavy metals, levels of lead, cobalt, mercury, uranium, and vanadium were above MTLs. Results suggest that home-prepared diets may be a health risk to dogs and cats if not properly formulated. Furthermore, the chronic heavy metal intake must be better elucidated in order to understand the full impact of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box-and-whisker plot of percentage of nutrient supply of recipes for dogs with nutrient levels below NRC1 and FEDIAF2 recommendations. Boxes represent interquartile range from 25th to 75th percentile, horizontal lines within boxes represent median, and bars above and below boxes represent maximum and minimum value points, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box-and-whisker plot of percentage of nutrient supply of recipes for cats with nutrient levels below NRC1 and FEDIAF2 recommendations. Boxes represent interquartile range from 25th to 75th percentile, horizontal lines within boxes represent median, and bars above and below boxes represent maximum and minimum value points, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box-and-whisker plot of percentage of nutrient supply of recipes for dogs and cats with heavy metal concentrations above maximum tolerable levels (MTL),. Boxes represent interquartile range from 25th to 75th percentile, horizontal lines within boxes represent median, and bars above and below boxes represent maximum and minimum value points, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dogs and Cats. (National Academy Press, 2006).
    1. FEDIAF. Nutritional Guidelines for Complete and Complementary Pet Food for Cats and Dogs. (Fédération Européenne de l’Industrie des Aliments pour Animaux Familiers, 2018).
    1. Freeman L, et al. Nutritional Assessment Guidelines. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2011;82:254–263. - PubMed
    1. Thatcher, C. D., Hand, M. S. & Remillard, R. L. Small animal clinical nutrition: an iterative process. in Small Animal Clinical Nutrition (eds Hand, M. S., Thatcher, C. D., Remillard, R. L., Roudebush, P. & Novotny, B. J.) 3–20 (Mark Morris Institute, 2010).
    1. Gross, K. L. et al. Macronutrients. In Small Animal Clinical Nutrition (eds. Hand, M. S., Thatcher, C. D., Remillard, R. L., Roudebush, P. & Novotny, B. J.) 49–105 (Mark Morris Institute, 2010).