Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
- PMID: 31506749
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
Abstract
Introduction: Open pyeloplasty (OP) has been the first-line treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) since it was first described by Anderson and Hynes. The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to treat UPJO in the pediatric population has increased in recent years, due to decreased morbidity and shorter recovery times. Recently, robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has seen a steady expansion. Unlike laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP), RALP comes with a more manageable learning curve aided by specialized technological advantages such as high-resolution three-dimensional view, tremor filtration with motion scaling, and highly dexterous wrist-like instruments. With this review, we aim to highlight the trend toward robotic pyeloplasty over laparoscopy and current available evidence on outcomes.
Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases, and we critically reviewed the available literature on the use of laparoscopy and robotic technology in pediatric patients with UPJO.
Results: Overall, we selected 19 original articles and 5 meta-analyses. The available literature showed that the robotic approach to the UPJO allowed for decreased operative times, shorter length of hospital stay, lower complication rates, with success rates comparable to LP. Conflicting results persist regarding robotic platform and equipment costs.
Conclusion: While laparoscopy requires advanced skills for complex reconstructive procedures, such as pyeloplasty, robot-assisted surgery offers the valuable potential of making MIS more accessible to these types of procedure. Robotic technology has contributed to shortening the learning curve by acting as a bridge between open and endoscopic approach. There is still a strong need for higher quality evidence in the form of prospective observational studies and clinical trials, as well as further cost-effectiveness analyses. As robotic surgical technology spreads, future systems will be developed, offering smaller and more flexible tools, allowing enhanced applications on pediatric patients.
Keywords: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Pediatric urology; Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Robotic pyeloplasty; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):667.e1-667.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.018. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Pediatr Urol. 2019. PMID: 31734119
-
Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Aug;12(4):229.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 12. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27346071
-
Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1. Epub 2023 Mar 13. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36913057 Free PMC article.
-
Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):537.e1-537.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 6. J Pediatr Urol. 2018. PMID: 30007500
-
A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children.J Pediatr Urol. 2022 Oct;18(5):642-649. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 3. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. PMID: 36117037
Cited by
-
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy.Res Rep Urol. 2020 Nov 10;12:555-562. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S238823. eCollection 2020. Res Rep Urol. 2020. PMID: 33204662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of the treatment effect of laparoscopic and robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 6;19(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02528-6. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40618311
-
Da Vinci robotic assisted pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty in newborns under 3 months.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28435. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14603-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40760161 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs. robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.Front Pediatr. 2022 Nov 8;10:1038454. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1038454. eCollection 2022. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 36425398 Free PMC article.
-
Are there disparities in access to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery among pediatric urology patients? US institutional experience.Int J Urol. 2022 Jul;29(7):661-666. doi: 10.1111/iju.14866. Epub 2022 Mar 26. Int J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35340066 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anderson JC, Hynes W (1949) Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 21(3):209–214 - DOI
-
- Liu DB, Ellimoottil C, Flum AS, Casey JT, Gong EM (2014) Contemporary national comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol 10(4):610–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ (2015) Births in the United States, 2014. NCHS Data Brief 216:1–8
-
- Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, Lee RS, Kurtz MP, Nelson CP et al (2018) Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol 14(4):336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Mei H, Pu J, Yang C, Zhang H, Zheng L, Tong Q (2011) Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 25(5):727–736. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0544 (e1–e8) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous