Understanding the effect of competition during evolutionary radiations: an integrated model of phenotypic and species diversification
- PMID: 31507039
- DOI: 10.1111/ele.13385
Understanding the effect of competition during evolutionary radiations: an integrated model of phenotypic and species diversification
Abstract
Competition can drive macroevolutionary change, for example during adaptive radiations. However, we still lack a clear understanding of how it shapes diversification processes and patterns. To better understand the macroevolutionary consequences of competition, as well as the signal left on phylogenetic data, we developed a model linking trait evolution and species diversification in an ecological context. We find four main results: first, competition spurs trait diversity but not necessarily species richness; second, competition produces slowdowns in species diversification even in the absence of explicit ecological limits, but not in phenotypic diversification even in the presence of such limits; third, early burst patterns do not provide a reliable way of testing for adaptive radiations; and fourth, looking for phylogenetic signal in trait data and support for phenotypic models incorporating competition is a better alternative. Our results clarify the macroevolutionary consequences of competition and could help design more powerful tests of adaptive radiations in nature.
Keywords: Adaptive radiation; comparative methods; disparity; diversity-dependence; macroevolution; morphospace; phylogenetics; protracted speciation.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.
References
-
- Aguilée, R., Gascuel, F., Lambert, A. & Ferriere, R. (2018). Clade diversification dynamics and the biotic and abiotic controls of speciation and extinction rates. Nat. Commun., 9, 1-13.
-
- Bailey, S.F., Dettman, J.R., Rainey, P.B. & Kassen, R. (2013). Competition both drives and impedes diversification in a model adaptive radiation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 280, 20131253.
-
- Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A.R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717-745.
-
- Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2004). Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Methods Res., 33, 261-304.
-
- Clarke, M., Thomas, G.H. & Freckleton, R.P. (2017). Trait evolution in adaptive radiations: modeling and measuring interspecific competition on phylogenies. Am. Nat., 189, 121-137.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
