Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 27:13:895.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00895. eCollection 2019.

A Systematic Review of Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) to Modulate Lower Limb Corticomotor Excitability: Implications for Stimulation Parameter Selection and Experimental Design

Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) to Modulate Lower Limb Corticomotor Excitability: Implications for Stimulation Parameter Selection and Experimental Design

Gemma Alder et al. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Non-invasive neuromodulatory interventions have the potential to influence neural plasticity and augment motor rehabilitation in people with stroke. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) involves the repeated pairing of single pulses of electrical stimulation to a peripheral nerve and single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralateral primary motor cortex. Efficacy of PAS in the lower limb of healthy and stroke populations has not been systematically appraised. Optimal protocols including stimulation parameter settings have yet to be determined. This systematic review (a) examines the efficacy of PAS on lower limb corticomotor excitability in healthy and stroke populations and (b) evaluates the stimulation parameters employed. Five databases were searched for randomized, non-randomized, and pre-post experimental studies evaluating lower limb PAS in healthy and stroke populations. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies and assessed methodological quality using a modified Downs and Blacks Tool and the TMS Checklist. Intervention stimulation parameters and TMS measurement details were also extracted and compared. Twelve articles, comprising 24 experiments, met the inclusion criteria. Four articles evaluated PAS in people with stroke. Following a single session of PAS, 21 experiments reported modulation of corticomotor excitability, lasting up to 60 min; however, the research lacked methodological rigor. Intervention stimulation parameters were highly variable across experiments, and whilst these appeared to influence efficacy, variations in the intervention and outcome assessment methods hindered the ability to draw conclusions about optimal parameters. Lower limb PAS research requires further investigation before considering its translation into clinical practice. Eight key recommendations serve as guide for enhancing future research in the field.

Keywords: STDP; cortical excitability; neuronal plasticity (MeSH); paired associative stimulation; primary motor cortex; rehabilitation (MeSH); stroke (MeSH); transcranial magnetic stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aubut J. A., Marshall S., Bayley M., Teasell R. W. (2013). A comparison of the PEDro and Downs and Black quality assessment tools using the acquired brain injury intervention literature. NeuroRehabilitation 32, 95–102. 10.3233/NRE-130826 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aymard C., Katz R., Lafitte C., Lo E., Pénicaud A., Pradat-Diehl P., et al. . (2000). Presynaptic inhibition and homosynaptic depression: a comparison between lower and upper limbs in normal human subjects and patients with hemiplegia. Brain 123(Pt 8), 1688–1702. 10.1093/brain/123.8.1688 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bashir S., Perez J. M., Horvath J. C., Pena-Gomez C., Vernet M., Capia A., et al. . (2014). Differential effects of motor cortical excitability and plasticity in young and old individuals: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) study. Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:111. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bastani A., Jaberzadeh S. (2012). Does anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhance excitability of the motor cortex and motor function in healthy individuals and subjects with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123, 644–657. 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batsikadze G., Moliadze V., Paulus W., Kuo M. F., Nitsche M. A. (2013). Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 591, 1987–2000. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types