Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct 1;1(6):5-6.
eCollection 2004 Oct.

Resource allocation for psychosis in Australia

Affiliations

Resource allocation for psychosis in Australia

Vaughan J Carr et al. Int Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Using a census-based prevalence survey (Jablensky et al, 2000), we estimated the cost of psychosis in urban Australia at AU$2.25 billion (£0.86 billion) per year when valued at prices pertaining in the year 2000 (Carr et al, 2003). About 40% of these costs were spent on direct mental health care, the remainder being the costs of lost productivity (limited to unemployment in our study). The total costs amounted to AU$46 200 (£17 722) per person per year, 20% higher than the average annual male income. The bulk of the treatment cost was accounted for by in-patient care, which appeared to have become the default option in the absence of adequate levels of supported community accommodation. This was indicated by the fact that after 'non-discretionary' treatment costs (42% of direct costs) were accounted for (i.e. visits to a general practitioner, medication, crisis or emergency care, acute hospitalisation), almost three-quarters of the remainder was spent on long-stay hospitalisation (Neil et al, 2003). When patterns of community-based service delivery were examined, we found a marked paucity of delivery of psychosocial treatments, rehabilitation and substance use interventions, reflecting the skewing of expenditure towards long-term hospitalisation and away from community care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Andrews, G., Sanderson K., Corry, J., et al. (2003) Cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatment for schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 427–435. - PubMed
    1. Andrews, G., Issakidis, C., Sanderson K., et al. (2004) Utilising survey data to inform public policy: comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 526–533. - PubMed
    1. Carr, V. J., Neil, A. L., Halpin, S. A., et al. (2003) Costs of schizophrenia and other psychoses in urban Australia: findings from the Low Prevalence (psychotic) Disorders Study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 31–40. - PubMed
    1. Carr, V. J., Lewin, T. J., Neil, A. L., et al. (2004) Premorbid, psychosocial and clinical predictors of the costs of schizophrenia and other psychoses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 517–525. - PubMed
    1. Jablensky, A., McGrath, J., Herrman, H., et al. (2000) Psychotic disorders in urban areas: an overview of the methods and findings of the study on low prevalence disorders. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 221–236. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources