Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 4:4:21.
doi: 10.1038/s41525-019-0095-6. eCollection 2019.

Predictive value of genomic screening: cross-sectional study of cystic fibrosis in 50,788 electronic health records

Affiliations

Predictive value of genomic screening: cross-sectional study of cystic fibrosis in 50,788 electronic health records

J P Sugunaraj et al. NPJ Genom Med. .

Abstract

Doubts have been raised about the value of DNA-based screening for low-prevalence monogenic conditions following reports of testing this approach using available electronic health record (EHR) as the sole phenotyping source. We hypothesized that a better model for EHR-focused examination of DNA-based screening is Cystic Fibrosis (CF) since the diagnosis is proactively sought within the healthcare system. We reviewed CFTR variants in 50,778 exomes. In 24 cases with bi-allelic pathogenic CFTR variants, there were 21 true-positives. We considered three cases "potential" false-positives due to limitations in available EHR phenotype data. This genomic screening exhibited a positive predictive value of 87.5%, negative predictive value of 99.9%, sensitivity of 95.5%, and a specificity of 99.9%. Despite EHR-based phenotyping limitations in three cases, the presence or absence of pathogenic CFTR variants has strong predictive value for CF diagnosis when EHR data is used as the sole phenotyping source. Accurate ascertainment of the predictive value of DNA-based screening requires condition-specific phenotyping beyond available EHR data.

Keywords: Genetic techniques; Personalized medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
EHR-based Genomic Screening for CF. In a database of 50,778 participants, there were 50,754 negatives, namely cases without bi-allelic pathogenic CFTR variants, and 24 positives, namely cases with such variants. Amongst the negatives, eight had EHR data suggesting a CF diagnosis, six of those had no CFTR pathogenic variants, and two had a single pathogenic variant. Open chart review concluded that one of the heterozygotes was a false negative and one was a true negative. The remainder of the negatives, those without bi-allelic CFTR variants or EHR data consistent with CF were also considered true negatives. Open chart review was pursued for all 24 positive cases. The diagnosis of CF was confirmed in 21 cases. In the remaining three cases the diagnosis could not be confirmed due to insufficient available evidence
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Data concordance in clinical and research CFTR variant results. Twenty of the 22 confirmed CF patients in the cohort also received their care in the Geisinger CF clinical program and had clinical CF genetic testing results available in their EHR. In the 20 cases with DNA data from both sources there was 100% pathogenic variant calling concordance

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Van Driest SL, et al. Association of arrhythmia-related genetic variants with phenotypes documented in electronic medical records. JAMA. 2016;315:47–57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17701. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haggerty CM, et al. Electronic health record phenotype in subjects with genetic variants associated with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a study of 30,716 subjects with exome sequencing. Genet. Med. 2017;19:1245–1252. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.40. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roden DM. Growing pains in cardiovascular genetics. Circulation. 2018;138:1206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035933. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burke W. Making sense of the genome remains a work in progress. JAMA. 2018;320:1247–1248. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11784. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center (GARD) https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/pages/31/faqs-about-rare-dise....