Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr 20;6(3):343-348.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.04.002. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.

Physical restraint in mental health nursing: A concept analysis

Affiliations
Review

Physical restraint in mental health nursing: A concept analysis

Junrong Ye et al. Int J Nurs Sci. .

Abstract

Objective: Physical restraint is frequently used in medical services, such as in mental health settings, intensive care units and nursing homes, but its nature varies in different institutions. By reviewing related literature, this study aims to clarify the concept of physical restraint in mental health nursing.

Method: Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were retrieved, and Walker and Avant's concept analysis method was used to analyze the concept of physical restraint in mental health nursing.

Results: Physical restraint is a coercive approach that enables the administration of necessary treatment by safely reducing the patient's physical movement. It should be the last option used by qualified personnel. Antecedents of physical restraint are improper behavior (violence and disturbance) of patients, medical assessment prior to implementation and legislation governing clinical usage. Consequences of physical restraint are alleviation of conflict, physical injury, mental trauma and invisible impact on the institution.

Discussion: This study defined the characteristics of physical restraint in mental health nursing. The proposed concept analysis provided theoretical foundation for future studies.

Keywords: Concept analysis; Mental health services; Physical restraint; Qualitative study; Walker and Avant's model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhu X.M., Xiang Y.T., Zhou J.S., Gou L., Himelhoch S., Ungvari G.S. Frequency of physical restraint and its associations with demographic and clinical characteristics in a Chinese psychiatric institution. Psychiatr Care. 2014;50:251–256. - PubMed
    1. Wynn R. The use of physical restraint in Norwegian adult psychiatric hospitals. Psychiatry J. 2015;2015:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beghi M., Peroni F., Gabola P., Rossetti A., Cornaggia C.M. Prevalence and risk factors for the use of restraint in psychiatry: a systematic review. Riv Psichiatr. 2013;48:10–22. - PubMed
    1. Staggs V.S. Trends in use of seclusion and restraint in response to injurious assault in psychiatric units in U.S. Hospitals, 2007-2013. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66:1369–1372. - PubMed
    1. Barnett R., Stirling C., Pandyan A.D. A review of the scientific literature related to the adverse impact of physical restraint: gaining a clearer understanding of the physiological factors involved in cases of restraint-related death. Med Sci Law. 2012;52:137–142. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources