Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 6:5:29.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-019-0125-7. eCollection 2019.

Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Affiliations

Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Merisa L Piper et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

Rates of positive margins after surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high (ranging from 18 to 60%), yet the efficacy of re-excision lumpReceptor subtypeectomy for clearing positive margins is unknown. Concerns about the diffuse nature of ILC may drive increased rates of completion mastectomy to treat positive margins, thus lowering breast conservation rates. We therefore determined the success rate of re-excision lumpectomy in women with ILC and positive margins after surgical resection. We identified 314 cases of stage I-III ILC treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) at the University of California, San Francisco. Surgical procedures, pathology reports, and outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics and Cox-proportional hazards models. We evaluated outcomes before and after the year 2014, when new margin management consensus guidelines were published. Positive initial margins occurred in 118 (37.6%) cases. Of these, 62 (52.5%) underwent re-excision lumpectomy, which cleared the margin in 74.2%. On multivariate analysis, node negativity was significantly associated with successful re-excision (odds ratio [OR] 3.99, 95% CI 1.15-13.81, p = 0.029). After 2014, we saw fewer initial positive margins (42.7% versus 25.5%, p = 0.009), second surgeries (54.6% versus 20.2%, p < 0.001), and completion mastectomies (27.7% versus 4.5%, p < 0.001). In this large cohort of women with ILC, re-excision lumpectomy was highly successful at clearing positive margins. Additionally, positive margins and completion mastectomy rates significantly decreased over time. These findings highlight improvements in management of ILC, and suggest that completion mastectomy may not be required for those with positive margins after initial BCS.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Cancer therapy; Outcomes research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of outcomes of patients with ILC who initially underwent BCS

References

    1. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Garvey E, Blair S. Intraoperative margin management in breast-conserving surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2018;25:18–27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5756-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sagara Y, et al. Surgical options and locoregional recurrence in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015;22:4280–4286. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4570-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mullenix PS, et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am. J. Surg. 2004;187:643–646. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fortunato L, et al. Lobular breast cancer: same survival and local control compared with ductal cancer, but should both be treated the same way? Analysis of an institutional database over a 10-year period. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2012;19:1107–1114. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1907-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winchester DJ, et al. A comparative analysis of lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast: presentation, treatment, and outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1998;186:416–422. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00051-9. - DOI - PubMed