Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Feb;102(2):153-159.
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0106. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

Benefits of barbed suture utilisation in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Benefits of barbed suture utilisation in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

T Wiggins et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Anastomosis formation constitutes a critical aspect of many gastrointestinal procedures. Barbed suture materials have been adopted by some surgeons to assist in this task. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the safety and efficacy of barbed suture material for anastomosis formation compared with standard suture materials.

Methods: An electronic search of Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases was performed. Weighted mean differences were calculated for effect size of barbed suture material compared with standard material on continuous variables and pooled odds ratios were calculated for discrete variables.

Findings: There were nine studies included. Barbed suture material was associated with a significant reduction in overall operative time (WMD: -12.87 (95% CI = -20.16 to -5.58) (P = 0.0005)) and anastomosis time (WMD: -4.28 (95% CI = -6.80 to -1.75) (P = 0.0009)). There was no difference in rates of anastomotic leak (POR: 1.24 (95% CI = 0.89 to 1.71) (P = 0.19)), anastomotic bleeding (POR: 0.80 (95% CI = 0.29 to 2.16) (P = 0.41)), or anastomotic stricture (POR: 0.72 (95% CI = 0.21 to 2.41) (P = 0.59)).

Conclusions: Use of barbed sutures for gastrointestinal anastomosis appears to be associated with shorter overall operative times. There was no difference in rates of complications (including anastomotic leak, bleeding or stricture) compared with standard suture materials.

Keywords: Anastomosis, Roux en-y; Barbed suture; Colorectal surgery; Gastric bypass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart with details of literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Barbed suture material was associated with a significant reduction in overall operative time (weighted mean difference –12.87, 95% confidence interval –20.16 to –5.58, P = 0.0005).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Barbed suture material was associated with a significant reduction in anastomosis time (weighted mean difference –4.28, 95% confidence interval –6.80 to –1.75, P = 0.0009).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Edholm D, Sundbom M. Comparison between circular- and linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a cohort from the Scandinavian Obesity Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2015; : 1,233–1,236. - PubMed
    1. Cleary RK, Kassir A, Johnson CS et al. . Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: a multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes. PLoS One 2018; : e0206277. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jiang H-P, Lin L-L, Jiang X, Qiao H-Q. Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Int J Surg 2016; : 150–157. - PubMed
    1. Awad S, Aguilo R, Agrawal S, Ahmed J. Outcomes of linear-stapled versus hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2015; : 2,278–2,283. - PubMed
    1. Bendewald FP, Choi JN, Blythe LS et al. . Comparison of hand-sewn, linear-stapled, and circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2011; : 1,671–1,675. - PubMed

MeSH terms