Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 1;45(5):331-339.
doi: 10.5152/tud.2019.19068. Print 2019 Sep.

The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery

Affiliations
Review

The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery

Rachael D Sussman et al. Turk J Urol. .

Abstract

In this article, we review the current uses and future directions of robotic surgery in the field of female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. Pelvic surgery is ideal for the use of surgical robots, which provide improved visualization and ease of suturing deep within the pelvis. Robots have been successfully used for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, in procedures such as sacrocolpopexy, sacrohysteropexy, and uterosacral ligament plication. Surgeons have used the robotic successfully to treat various etiologies of female pelvic pain including fibroids, endometriosis, and nerve entrapment. Robotic repair of iatrogenic injury has been described with excellent outcomes and avoidance of conversion to open surgery in the event of an injury caused using the robotic platform. While more data is needed on this topic, there has been increasing interest in using the robot for urologic reconstruction including repair of vesico-vaginal fistula, cystectomy, augmentation cystoplasty, and continent and non-continent diversions. Recently the use of the robot has been described in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in females, with robotic placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. While robotic surgery is associated with increased cost, the outcomes of robotic surgery in female urology are promising. More studies that properly evaluate the benefits of robotic surgery as compared to open and laparoscopic approaches are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jones SB, Jones DB. Surgical aspects and future developments of laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2001;19:107–24. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8537(05)70214-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim VB, Chapman WH, Albrecht RJ, Bailey BM, Young JA, Nifong LW, et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12:33–40. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fuchs KH. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy. 2002;34:154–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-19857. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg. 2004;239:14–21. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35:153–60. doi: 10.1109/10.1354. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources