Systemic perioperative prophylaxis in elective oncological colorectal surgery: cefotetan versus clindamicin plus aztreonam
- PMID: 3150952
Systemic perioperative prophylaxis in elective oncological colorectal surgery: cefotetan versus clindamicin plus aztreonam
Abstract
A prospective randomized study was performed with 65 patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer, to evaluate the prophylactic effect of two different parenteral antibiotic regimens. All patients underwent rigorous mechanical cleansing of the bowel (enemas, laxatives), received low-residue diet 3 days pre-operatively, and were given oral metronidazole (250 mg) five times a day for 3 days preoperatively. They were divided into two groups comparable in age, nutritional status and operative procedure. The patients in group A (36) received 2 g i.v. of cefotetan at induction of anaesthesia and two other administrations every 12 h. Patients in group B (29) were given clindamicin (600 mg, i.v.) at induction of anaesthesia plus aztreonam (1 g, i.v.); two other doses of the same combined antibiotics were administered every 8 h. Five patients were excluded from the study because they underwent Miles procedure; two others because they underwent explorative laparotomy only. The overall incidence of post-operative septic complications was 6.9% (4/58). No significant differences were found in terms of the rate of surgical infections: 3.1 in group A (1/32) and 0% in group B. Urinary tract infections (1 case) and respiratory tract infections (2 cases) were observed only in group B: the rate was found to be 11.5% (3/26); two anastomotic leakages were observed in group A (6.25%) and one in group B (3.8%). These data suggest that cefotetan appears to be as effective as clindamicin plus aztreonam in prophylaxis against infection in elective colorectal surgery.
Similar articles
-
Prospective comparative study of cefotetan with piperacillin for prophylaxis against infection in elective colorectal surgery.J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990 Feb;35(1):29-32. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990. PMID: 2342006 Clinical Trial.
-
Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2640-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054408. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 17182989 Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal surgery: short-term prophylaxis with aztreonam plus clindamycin versus gentamicin plus clindamycin.J Chemother. 1989 Jul;1(4 Suppl):1008-9. J Chemother. 1989. PMID: 16312746 No abstract available.
-
Pre-operative mechanical bowel cleansing or not? an updated meta-analysis.Colorectal Dis. 2005 Jul;7(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00804.x. Colorectal Dis. 2005. PMID: 15932549 Review.
-
[The value of antibiotic prophylaxis using cefotetan in high-risk abdominal hysterectomy. Apropos of a prospective randomized study of 71 patients].Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1988 Nov;83(11):737-40. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1988. PMID: 3060967 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Cefotetan versus conventional triple antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal cancer surgery.J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Mar;25(3):429-34. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.3.429. Epub 2010 Feb 17. J Korean Med Sci. 2010. PMID: 20191043 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for colorectal surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD001181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001181.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24817514 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: focus on ertapenem.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009;5:829-39. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s3101. Epub 2009 Nov 2. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009. PMID: 19898647 Free PMC article.
-
[Etiology and consequences of postoperative wound infection].Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991;376(3):172-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00250343. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1991. PMID: 1870366 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical