Health differences between multiple and single job holders in precarious employment in the Netherlands: A cross-sectional study among Dutch workers
- PMID: 31509574
- PMCID: PMC6738659
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222217
Health differences between multiple and single job holders in precarious employment in the Netherlands: A cross-sectional study among Dutch workers
Abstract
Introduction: Precarious employment is associated with poor health. Among employees in precarious employment, those with multiple jobs may face additional health risks, e.g. due to combining work schedules and job roles. Our research question is: do differences in health exist between multiple and single job holders in precarious employment?
Methods: Participants in the Netherlands Working Conditions Survey 2012 aged 25-64 years who were not employed through the Act on Social Work Provision and who had a precarious job were included. To select employees in precarious employment (n = 3,609), latent class analysis was performed, based on variables based on indicators described by Van Aerden. Differences in general self-perceived health, burnout complaints, musculoskeletal health, and sickness absence between multiple and single job holders were studied cross-sectionally using logistic regression analyses.
Results: No significant differences were found between multiple and single job holders in precarious employment for self-perceived health (OR = 0.9; 95%CI = 0.7-1.3), burnout complaints (OR = 0.9; 95%CI = 0.7-1.2), and musculoskeletal health (OR = 1.1; 95%CI = 0.8-1.5). In crude analyses, multiple job holders experienced less sickness absence than single job holders (OR = 0.7; 95%CI = 0.5-0.9). In adjusted analyses, this difference was no longer statistically significant (OR = 0.8; 95%CI = 0.6-1.0).
Conclusions: Despite potential health risks related to multiple job holding, we did not find health differences between multiple and single job holders in precarious employment in the Netherlands. More longitudinal research is necessary to provide recommendations for policy makers regarding multiple job holders in precarious employment.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Distinguishing groups and exploring health differences among multiple job holders aged 45 years and older.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Jan;92(1):67-79. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1351-2. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019. PMID: 30196318 Free PMC article.
-
The longitudinal association between multiple job holding and long-term sickness absence among Danish employees: an explorative study using register-based data.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1243-x. Epub 2017 Jul 1. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28669035 Free PMC article.
-
Productivity loss at work; health-related and work-related factors.J Occup Rehabil. 2010 Sep;20(3):331-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9219-7. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. PMID: 19921406
-
[The health of permanent workers and workers with precarious employment: a literature review].Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2011;53(4):117-39. doi: 10.1539/sangyoeisei.a11002. Epub 2011 Jun 8. Sangyo Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2011. PMID: 21666349 Review. Japanese.
-
Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study.Soc Sci Med. 2000 May;50(9):1317-27. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00388-3. Soc Sci Med. 2000. PMID: 10728851 Review.
Cited by
-
Vulnerability profiles of workers and the relation with burnout symptoms: results from the Netherlands working conditions survey.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024 Aug;97(6):651-660. doi: 10.1007/s00420-024-02071-1. Epub 2024 May 27. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2024. PMID: 38797814 Free PMC article.
-
Stress and the gig economy: it's not all shifts and giggles.Ind Health. 2023 Apr 1;61(2):140-150. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0217. Epub 2022 Mar 4. Ind Health. 2023. PMID: 35249894 Free PMC article.
-
Employment trajectories and mental health-related disability in Belgium.Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023 Mar;96(2):285-302. doi: 10.1007/s00420-022-01923-y. Epub 2022 Oct 10. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2023. PMID: 36214912 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Van Aerden K, Moors G, Levecque K, Vanroelen C. Measuring employment arrangements in the European labour force: a typological approach. Soc Indicators Res 2014;116(3):771–791.
-
- Olsthoorn M. Measuring precarious employment: A proposal for two indicators of precarious employment based on set-theory and tested with Dutch labor market-data. Soc Indicators Res 2014;119(1):421–441.
-
- Benach J, Vives A, Amable M, Vanroelen C, Tarafa G, Muntaner C. Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health 2014;35. - PubMed
-
- Ervasti J, Virtanen M. Research strategies for precarious employment. Scand J Work Environ Health 2019. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources