Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep 11;14(9):e0222260.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222260. eCollection 2019.

The use of urinary fluoride excretion to facilitate monitoring fluoride intake: A systematic scoping review

Affiliations

The use of urinary fluoride excretion to facilitate monitoring fluoride intake: A systematic scoping review

Oladipo S Idowu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: As a recognised effective and economical agent for dental caries prevention, fluoride has been used in many different fluoridation schemes implemented across the world. Considering the narrow 'dose-gap' between the benefit of caries reduction and the risk of dental fluorosis, it is recommended that fluoride intake is monitored by measuring urinary fluoride excretion. The aim of this scoping review is to map the current literature/evidence on fluoride intake and excretion studies in relation to the study population, settings, type of study design, methodology, and analytical approach.

Methods: Embase/Ovid, MEDLINE/Ovid, CINAHL/EBSCO, Scopus/Elsevier were searched for relevant articles until April 2018. Studies were included if they reported intake and excretion of fluoride in healthy humans of all age groups. Findings were explored using a narrative synthesis to summarise studies characteristics and outcome measures.

Results: Removal of duplicates from the originally 2295 identified records yielded 1093 studies of which 206 articles were included. Only 21.6% of the studies were conducted in children (<8-year-olds). Most studies (38.8%) used drinking water concentration as a proxy for fluoride intake, whereas only 11.7% measured fluoride intake from all sources. Of the 72 studies that measured dietary fluoride intake, only 10 reported the validity of the employed dietary assessment method. Only 14 studies validated the urine sample collection methods. No information on the validity of the employed analytical method was reported by the majority (64.6%) of studies. Only a small proportion (8.7%) of the included studies investigated the association between fluoride intake and excretion.

Conclusion: The findings reveal much variability in terms of conducting the studies and reporting the findings, illustrating a high heterogeneity in data collection across settings and populations. Future studies should provide more detail on sampling technique, measurement protocols (including validation), and on clearly defining the relationship between intake and urinary excretion of fluoride.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart outlining identification of papers for inclusion following the Prisma flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Distribution of included studies according to continent.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Petersen PE, Ogawa H. Prevention of dental caries through the use of fluoride—the WHO approach. Community Dent. Health. 2016;33(2):66–8. 10.1922/CDH_Petersen03 WOS:000377644900001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burt BA. The changing patterns of systemic fluoride intake. J Dent Res. 1992;71(5):1228–37. - PubMed
    1. Rugg-Gunn AJ. Introduction: Guidelines for Fluoride Intake-Are They Appropriate? Adv Dent Res. 2018;29(2):142–3. 10.1177/0022034517750588 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spencer AJ, Do LG, Mueller U, Baines J, Foley M, Peres MA. Understanding Optimum Fluoride Intake from Population-Level Evidence. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29(2):144–56. 10.1177/0022034517750592 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zohoori FV. Summary of General Discussion and Conclusions. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29(2):183–5. 10.1177/0022034517750591 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types