Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Sep 11;12(9):e227973.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-227973.

Birth asphyxia following delayed recognition and response to abnormal labour progress and fetal distress in a 31-year-old multiparous Malawian woman

Affiliations
Case Reports

Birth asphyxia following delayed recognition and response to abnormal labour progress and fetal distress in a 31-year-old multiparous Malawian woman

Yvette N Löwensteyn et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Reducing neonatal mortality is one of the targets of Sustainable Development Goal 3 on good health and well-being. The highest rates of neonatal death occur in sub-Saharan Africa. Birth asphyxia is one of the major preventable causes. Early detection and timely management of abnormal labour progress and fetal compromise are critical to reduce the global burden of birth asphyxia. Labour progress, maternal and fetal well-being are assessed using the WHO partograph and intermittent fetal heart rate monitoring. However, in low-resource settings adherence to labour guidelines and timely response to arising labour complications is generally poor. Reasons for this are multifactorial and include lack of resources and skilled health care staff. This case study in a Malawian hospital illustrates how delayed recognition of abnormal labour and prolonged decision-to-delivery interval contributed to birth asphyxia, as an example of many delivery rooms in low-income country settings.

Keywords: global health; healthcare improvement and patient safety; neonatal health; obstetrics and gynaecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization, UNICEF. Every newborn action plan. 2014. https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/hnn-content/uploads/Every_Newborn_... [Accessed 26 Jun 2018].
    1. United Nations. Sustainable development goals. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals [Accessed 3 Sep 2017].
    1. UNICEF, WHO, World Bank Group and United Nations. Levels & trends in child mortality. Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Report. 2017. https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_101071.html [Accessed 21 Ju 2018].
    1. Fottrell E, Osrin D, Alcock G, et al. . Cause-specific neonatal mortality: analysis of 3772 neonatal deaths in Nepal, Bangladesh, Malawi and India. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F439–47. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307636 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? The Lancet 2005;365:891–900. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types