Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 2:2019:7059806.
doi: 10.1155/2019/7059806. eCollection 2019.

The Evolving View of Coronary Artery Calcium: A Personalized Shared Decision-Making Tool in Primary Prevention

Affiliations
Review

The Evolving View of Coronary Artery Calcium: A Personalized Shared Decision-Making Tool in Primary Prevention

Omar Dzaye et al. Cardiol Res Pract. .

Abstract

The 2018 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) cholesterol management guideline considers current evidence on coronary artery calcium (CAC) testing while incorporating learnings from previous guidelines. More than any previous guideline update, this set encourages CAC testing to facilitate shared decision making and to individualize treatment plans. An important novelty is further separation of risk groups. Specifically, the current prevention guideline recommends CAC testing for primary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevention among asymptomatic patients in borderline and intermediate risk groups (5-7.5% and 7.5-20% 10-year ASCVD risk). This additional sub-classification reflects the uncertainty of treatment strategies for patients broadly considered to be "intermediate risk," as treatment recommendations for high and low risk groups are well established. The 2018 guidelines, for the first time, clearly recognize the significance of a CAC score of zero, where intensive statin therapy is likely not beneficial and not routinely recommended in selected patients. Lifestyle modification should be the focus in patients with CAC = 0. In this article, we review the recent AHA/ACC cholesterol management guideline and contextualize the transition of CAC testing to a guideline-endorsed decision aid for borderline-to-intermediate risk patients who seek more definitive risk assessment as part of a clinician-patient discussion. CAC testing can reduce low-value treatment and focus primary prevention therapy on those most likely to benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Coronary artery calcium testing.

References

    1. Kianoush S., Mirbolouk M., Makam R. C., Nasir K., Blaha M. J. Coronary artery calcium scoring in current clinical practice: how to define its value? Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2017;19(11):p. 85. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0582-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso R., Nasir K., Blumenthal R. S., Blaha M. J. Selective use of coronary artery calcium testing for shared decision making: guideline endorsed and ready for prime time. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019;170(4):p. 262. doi: 10.7326/M18-3675. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cainzos-Achirica M., Desai C. S., Wang L., et al. Pathways forward in cardiovascular disease prevention one and a half years after publication of the 2013 ACC/AHA cardiovascular disease prevention guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(9):1262–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.05.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeFilippis A. P., Young R., Carrubba C. J., et al. An analysis of calibration and discrimination among multiple cardiovascular risk scores in a modern multiethnic cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):266–275. doi: 10.7326/m14-1281. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenland P., Alpert J. S., Beller G. A., et al. ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010;56(25):e50–e103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources