Conflicting findings from a rubber industry cohort study: what is the explanation?
- PMID: 31515444
- DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105841
Conflicting findings from a rubber industry cohort study: what is the explanation?
Keywords: cohort studies; rubber industry.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: TS is PI for a contemporary cohort study of health risks in the rubber industry and the University of Birmingham has received funds in recent years from both the European Tyre & Rubber Manufacturers’ Association (ETRMA) and the British Tyre Manufacturers’ Association (BTMA) to defray the costs of this study. A draft of the current letter was not shared with others.
Comment in
-
Healthy worker effects explain differences in internal and external comparisons in a rubber industry cohort study.Occup Environ Med. 2019 Oct;76(10):781. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106083. Occup Environ Med. 2019. PMID: 31515445 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Lifetime exposure to rubber dusts, fumes and N-nitrosamines and cancer mortality in a cohort of British rubber workers with 49 years follow-up.Occup Environ Med. 2019 Apr;76(4):250-258. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105181. Epub 2019 Feb 16. Occup Environ Med. 2019. PMID: 30772818 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources