Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 12:16:A3.
doi: 10.18332/tid/99881. eCollection 2018.

The Conceptual Model and Methods of Wave 1 (2016) of the EUREST-PLUS ITC 6 European Countries Survey

Affiliations

The Conceptual Model and Methods of Wave 1 (2016) of the EUREST-PLUS ITC 6 European Countries Survey

Geoffrey T Fong et al. Tob Induc Dis. .

Abstract

Population-level interventions represent the only real approach for combatting the tobacco epidemic. There is thus great importance in conducting rigorous evaluation studies of tobacco control policies and regulations such as those arising from the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the European Union's 2014 Tobacco Products Directive (TPD). The ITC 6 European Countries Survey, a component of the Horizon 2020 Project entitled European Regulatory Science on Tobacco: Policy Implementation to Reduce Lung Disease (EUREST-PLUS), was created to evaluate and impact of the TPD in six EU Member States: Germany, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Spain. In each country, a cohort survey of a representative national sample of 1000 smokers was conducted. This paper describes the conceptual model, methodology, and initial survey statistics of Wave 1 of the ITC 6E Survey, which was conducted June-September 2016. The ITC 6E Survey's conceptual model, methodology, and survey instrument, were based on the broader 29-country ITC Project cohort studies, which have been conducted since 2002. The commonality of methods and measures allow a strong potential for cross-country comparisons between the 6 EU countries of the ITC 6E Project and 3 other EU countries (England, France, The Netherlands) in the ITC Project, as well as the broader set of ITC countries outside the EU.

Keywords: EU Tobacco Products Directive; ITC Project; cohort study; evaluation; tobacco control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise, related to the current work. N. Bécuwe reports grants from Kantar Public Brussels, during the conduct of the study. K. Przewoźniak reports grants and personal fees from the Polish League Against Cancer, outside the submitted work. C. I. Vardavas reports that he is the Strategic Development Editor of TID and that there are no conflicts of interest with this current work. The rest of the authors have also completed and submitted an ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The ITC Conceptual Model used in the construction of the ITC Surveys

References

    1. Chung-Hall J, Craig L, Gravely S, Sansone N, Fong GT. Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: A global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group. Tob Control. 2018 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Contro FCTC/COP/7/6. Impact assessment of the WHO FCTC: Report by the Expert Group; WHO; Geneva. 2016. http://www.who.int/fctc/cop/cop7/FCTC_COP_7_6_EN.pdf. Accessed November 2, 2018.
    1. Gravely S, Giovino GA, Craig LV, et al. Implementation of key demand-reduction measures of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and change in smoking prevalence in 126 countries: an association study. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(4):e166–e174. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30045-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vardavas CI, Bécuwe N, Demjén T, et al. Study Protocol of European Regulatory Science on Tobacco (EURESTPLUS): Policy implementation to reduce lung disease. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2018;16(Suppl 2:A2) doi: 10.18332/tid/93305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook T, Campbell DT. Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 1979.

LinkOut - more resources